Results 1 to 20 of 31

Thread: Lightweight Battery?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    hampden,ma.usa
    Posts
    3,083

    Default

    I don’t believe that battery is legal either, however I when I needed a new battery I went to the Auto Palace web site and typed in 82 RX7 and found a spread of 20 pounds amongst the recommended batteries.
    dick patullo
    ner scca IT7 Rx7

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Belmont, CA
    Posts
    226

    Default

    So, what is the official word? It seems like "similar" is way too nebulous. How is the OEM battery weight determined, since most OEM specs will not designate the weight?

    Seems like this either needs to be removed, or the wording needs to reworked to make it clear exactly what is required. I would vote for removal, since we already have an overall weight limit.
    Scot Mac - Mac Motorsports
    88 ITB Fiero #41, SFR, NWR, ICSCC

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    hampden,ma.usa
    Posts
    3,083

    Default

    There is no official word and certainly not on this website. The only way to get an official word is to have a protest reach the Court of Appeals and even that is imperfect.
    What you can get is a reality check on you position. If you have position and you get support for rational people than you can feel better about pushing the envelope.
    dick patullo
    ner scca IT7 Rx7

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Belmont, CA
    Posts
    226

    Default

    Yes, i know the process. However, that is not the direction i am going here.

    It is obviously that the intent of the rule was that batteries are restricted to w/in a few pounds of the original battery. It is also fairly obvious that the wording of the rule and the reality of the stock specs make enforcement of this rule almost impossible. Thus, as i said, the rule should somehow be re-written, or dropped entirely. I vote for the latter.
    Scot Mac - Mac Motorsports
    88 ITB Fiero #41, SFR, NWR, ICSCC

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    In the green Honda
    Posts
    449

    Default

    I disagree. There are many rules that are not easily enforceable, we can't drop all of them. You can name 100 parts with no specs.

    And it's a fallicy to say that "similar weight" is pointless because the car has a min weight. It's pretty clear the intent of the rules is to prevent us all from buying $250 batteries every year. If all we are going to do is weight the car and anything else goes, then things get expensive. I know, you don't have to buy the battery, but if you can, then you must. The rule has a purpose. Making it easier to shed weight simply by paying money is what the rules seeks to prevent. By that argument we'll all be running CF hoods next year.

    It's also not true to say you can choose the lightest replacement battery. "...similar amp-hour capacity and weight..." That is an AND, not an OR.

    I'm not usually a rule nanny, but the intent and goal of the rule seems clear. Don't make me spend more money just to save weight.
    Jim Hardesty
    ITC 1986 Honda Civic Diablo Rojo Verde
    Never argue your tab at the end of the night. Remember, you're hammered and they’re sober.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Belmont, CA
    Posts
    226

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jumbojimbo View Post
    I disagree. There are many rules that are not easily enforceable, we can't drop all of them. You can name 100 parts with no specs.

    And it's a fallicy to say that "similar weight" is pointless because the car has a min weight. It's pretty clear the intent of the rules is to prevent us all from buying $250 batteries every year. If all we are going to do is weight the car and anything else goes, then things get expensive. I know, you don't have to buy the battery, but if you can, then you must. The rule has a purpose. Making it easier to shed weight simply by paying money is what the rules seeks to prevent. By that argument we'll all be running CF hoods next year.

    It's also not true to say you can choose the lightest replacement battery. "...similar amp-hour capacity and weight..." That is an AND, not an OR.

    I'm not usually a rule nanny, but the intent and goal of the rule seems clear. Don't make me spend more money just to save weight.
    You are right, the rule is an AND. The rule applies to both the amp-hour and weight of the battery. We are focusing on the weight portion here (if you didn't notice). Which is the portion that is unenforceable (since there is no baseline).

    Your argument is that it is ok to have this unenforceable rule, because there are lots of others? It doesn't make any sense that an unenforceable rule is making you pay less money. If it is unenforceable, then people are already paying the money you are worrying about.

    The rule should be made enforceable or dropped.
    Scot Mac - Mac Motorsports
    88 ITB Fiero #41, SFR, NWR, ICSCC

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jumbojimbo View Post
    because the car has a min weight.
    Exactly, the car has a minimum weight.

    You wish to get to minimum weight with a $250 battery from Pegasus. Bob wants to redesign his cage to lose 15 lbs. Robert wants to lose 15 lbs out of his fat ass. Folks have choices.

    The car has a minimum weight. Seems to me that the rule of the battery remaining in the stock location would be enough.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    My battery (stock) sits over the right rear tire. So, oddly enough, I do the opposite -- I look for a reasonably heavy battery.......

    I think the "reasonably equivalent" weight rule probably should go given the wide sread of "stock" batteries and their weights.
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    721

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dickita15 View Post
    I don’t believe that battery is legal either, however I when I needed a new battery I went to the Auto Palace web site and typed in 82 RX7 and found a spread of 20 pounds amongst the recommended batteries.
    Dick...Do you know if the lighter batteries have less capacity?
    Just wondering...in Ham Radio, the more the weight, the better the boat anchor.

    Bruce
    N1MZI

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Wheaton, IL
    Posts
    1,893

    Default

    There is a 10-15lb spread on battery weight for my car, but that is because the cars with AC came with much larger batteries, and they all come up in a search. I have never seen more than a 5# swing on the same capacity/size battery, and yes the el-cheapo brands are best for this IMO.
    Chris Schaafsma
    Golf 2 HProd

    AMT Racing Engines - DIYAutoTune.com

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •