Quote Originally Posted by 77ITA View Post
It's really pleasing to see some actual explanations for reasoning from the CRB on the "Not Recommended" items instead of the usual blanket response of "not within class philosphy".

Great examples from this FasTrack:
"This would cause an unnecessary cost increase"
"This would create a model that
was not built"

It's about damn time.

yea, and we've been talking and trying to do that for awhile...
but...I bet money next month will have a letter debating our response for something!