Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 67

Thread: What other racing organization requires SFI?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    please note that i am not trying to take anything out of context from this other post:

    http://www.nasaforums.com/viewtopic....19384&start=30

    please read it at the above link. i have no issue with what Greg is stating in the above but here is an excerpt that references that others are now requiring SFI.

    I just got an e-mail from another organization that I used to race with telling me that I must comply with a 38.1 certified HNR by February '08.
    _________________
    Greg Greenbaum
    National & SoCal TT, PT, & ST Director [/b]
    does anyone know what other sanctioning bodies are doing this?

    if it has been mentioned here in other threads then i have either missed it or fallen victim to CRS again. i am interested in this for something that is completely divorced from the nasa debate.

    tia, tom
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    I really liked your "irony" post there, so here's mine.





    K

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    553

    Default


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    I really liked your "irony" post there, so here's mine.

    ...snip....

    K
    [/b]

    i completely missed that!

    i am completely unaware of how the internet ads work. is that being applied to all threads or do they target a thread that has keywords like head and neck in it.

    this is one of the reasons that i think a sanctioning body as a for profit business does not work well. they are selling advertising to a company that is part of the SFI that they require their racers to use.

    it may not be black helicopters but it sure is one of those things that make you go hmmm.....

    p.s., i do not consider ICMS to be a sanctioning body
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    553

    Default

    [/b]
    Nor do I, I posted that pix as part of the "irony series", note the HANS!

    This doesn't answer your original question, but may be of interest

    http://www.sfifoundation.com/member.html

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Oh, yeah - sorry. I figured everyone involved knew that NASA and SCCA are SFI members. That's kind of part of how the system works.

    K

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    553

    Default

    Rally America:

    "D. SFI 38.1 licensed, or FIA 8858-2002 approved head and neck restraint systems are recommended, and required for all Rally America events as of 1/1/08. When fitted, these systems shall be mounted per the manufacturer's recommendations and shall not violate the single latch requirement of the occupant restraint system."

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    Jim,

    thanks for the irony on that one too. i missed it.

    i will ask some rally guys more about that as well.

    but that one appears to be effective 1/1/08 as opposed to something happening in february.

    any others?

    tia, tom
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Sterling, VA
    Posts
    734

    Default

    Rally America:

    "D. SFI 38.1 licensed, or FIA 8858-2002 approved head and neck restraint systems are recommended, and required for all Rally America events as of 1/1/08. When fitted, these systems shall be mounted per the manufacturer's recommendations and shall not violate the single latch requirement of the occupant restraint system."
    [/b]

    That has to be one of the most interesting things I have seen in ALL of this. The organization feels that they NEED to specifically state the single point of release.
    Spanky | #73 ITA 1990 Honda Civic WDCR SOLD | #73 ITA 1995 Honda Civic WDCR in progress |
    ** Sponsored by J&L Automotive (703) 327-5239 | Engineered Services, Inc. http://www.EngineeredServices.com **

    Isaac Rules | Build Pictures

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    553

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA
    Posts
    1,381

    Default

    BMWCCA club racing also requires 38.1 this year.
    Josh Sirota
    ITR '99 BMW Z3 Coupe

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Scottsdale AZ
    Posts
    322

    Default

    BMWCCA club racing also requires 38.1 this year. [/b]
    Actually, I think BMW racing required an SFI device in 2007 (beginning in April I believe).

    On the ICMS web site the HANS logo is not an ad per se. HANS is actually a sponsor of the organization.


    Spec RX7 #11
    Scottsdale AZ

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    ** BMWCCA joined SFI and began requiring 38.1 devices maybe a year before SCCA made its initial move to consider the issue, on the heels of a fatality at one of their events

    ** A dude named Joe Marko was (maybe still is?) the BMWCCA national safety guy at the time of that move

    ** He runs a company that is a Hans dealer and he makes speaking appearances as a "safety expert"

    K

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    553

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Roanoke, VA
    Posts
    173

    Default

    Porsche Club of America


    4. After June 1, 2008, a head and neck restraint meeting either the standards of either SFI 38.1 or FIA 8858 will be required.
    Jim Politi

    Done some racin'.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    553

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    553

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    NHRA as of 2007[/b]
    Quite amusing, looking through that vast list of SFI-spec products that NHRA is requiring this year.

    Hell, I'm kinda shocked they're not requiring SFI-spec taillights...


  19. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    553

    Default

    NHRA begat SEMA begat SFI..........

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Westminster, CO, USA
    Posts
    59

    Default

    I like the SFI spec 7.2 diapers ... (aka, lower engine containment device)

    Quite amusing, looking through that vast list of SFI-spec products that NHRA is requiring this year.

    Hell, I'm kinda shocked they're not requiring SFI-spec taillights...
    [/b]

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •