Results, rumours and inuendo...

[Andy Bettencourt]

If *I* were to run the 2.5 Fiero through the process for ITB assuming 98 stock HP, it would fall around 2265lbs.

Of course, the other 8 guys get a vote too...

[shwah]

Well there we go

Does it take more than this discussion to have the car reviewed, or are those gears already in motion?

EDIT - and to think it's not even thanksgiving yet. Too bad we can't share a round of after days like this.

[Knestis]

Is that 98hp the most potent engine available from among the years/derivatives listed on the spec line in question? If so, that's cool. If not, you need to use the most powerful up-/back-date option, or put them on different spec lines.

Otherwise, heck yeah - review away ITAC.

K

[924Guy]

If *I* were to run the 2.5 Fiero through the process for ITB assuming 98 stock HP, it would fall around 2265lbs.

Of course, the other 8 guys get a vote too...
[/b]

OK, so given such processing, and the opinions weighed in by Beran and others, I have to ask - where does the 2.0L 924 come out of the ITB process at, given 115hp stock? Anywhere south of 2600#??

[Andy Bettencourt]

OK, so given such processing, and the opinions weighed in by Beran and others, I have to ask - where does the 2.0L 924 come out of the ITB process at, given 115hp stock? Anywhere south of 2600#?? [/b]

Sure does. About 100lbs South IMHO.

[ScotMac]

Is that 98hp the most potent engine available from among the years/derivatives listed on the spec line in question? If so, that's cool. If not, you need to use the most powerful up-/back-date option, or put them on different spec lines.

Otherwise, heck yeah - review away ITAC.

K
[/b]

Yes, 98hp is the most powerful. I purposely used the 88's stock hp, since it was the most powerful. Also happens to be what i have?

[Bill Miller]

Chris,

Interesting dyno numbers. Based on Andy's 'pack vs. 'jet correlation approximation, and the corresponding estimated crank numbers, looks like you're getting somewhere around a 35% gain over stock hp w/ that build. Pretty impressive.

[shwah]

As I stated before. A stock motor with port matching, header and coolant temp sensor enrichment was 95 (or was it 96?) hp and 103 tq on this very dyno in my car. I don't buy for a second that I have 35% over the stock 105hp GTI.

2nd edit - Bill I think you are kidding, but don't know whether others would get it.