Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 43

Thread: New Z Motor for Earp's 260Z

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    The new 260Z motor is done now after a couple of months down time. Motor has all new bits, new Nissan race cam, 3.1L big more kit, 11.5 compression......just kidding!

    The motor is 0.040" over now and has new pistons, all new valves, valve job, some high high buck replacement rings, and good bearings. Got a set of new valve springs too. It got treated to a new oil pump, new water pump, and all new timing gear. Flywheel and pressure plate were re-balanced as an assembly too. Everything seems to be in good order and we're really for the installation later this week.

    The compression is about 0.1 lower than max 0.5 IT spec. Seems the head gasket I have now that came from Riely in Lynchburg is thicker than the one that came off the car. The head was surfaced but only like 0.002" or so as it was quite flat apparently and we didn't take off enough to offset the gasket thickness change. Oh well.

    I adjusted the valves on Saturday morning and did the best I could to make sure the cam lobes hit the center of the pads. Intake 0.008" and exhaust 0.010". Do you Z guys recommend any different adjustment? And, once I get it fired up and run in a bit how quickly do you go back and check them?

    I'm hoping fire up will go well and I'll have a reliable race motor for a couple of years at least. Keeping my fingers crossed!

    R






  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Rocket City, Alabama
    Posts
    607

    Default

    Ron, can't help much on the tech question but I am wondering how well those boat anchors feed the beast

    As they say in the south, "It shore is purty" and I know you are glad to have it ready to go back in.

    BTW, Nice shop, air-conditioned and beverage cooler close at hand
    Paul Ballance
    Tennessee Valley Region (yeah it's in Alabama)
    ITS '72
    1972 240Z
    "Experience is what you get when you're expecting something else." unknown

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    The flat tops work pretty good. They were set up by ERnie Radatz about 15 years ago, and the car has good power.
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Thanks much!

    They work ok actually. Mike has to run them as well. The biggest problem is at idle (when adjusted for top end) they are incredibly rich. And, they can foul the plugs as well as make the engine really hard to hot start. I hope that another heat shield might help that hot start problem, but I sort of doubt it.

    I have good EGTs now and will adjust them a bit rich to start with and work the rest out via dyno and track.

    They are not as bad as folks made them out to be. The motor doesn't lack for mid range and top end power when it is running well. I don't know that it can make 240Z power with the head and all, but I think it can get close.

    Two little bits that are interesting in the 260Z - the exhaust valve is a bit larger than the 240Z and the cam is different. The 260Z cam has a bit longer duration with the events shifted later in relation to the 240Z. The intake lift is 0.4mm less than the 240Z, but the exhaust lift is the same.

    We (Jeffery Rousell and I) now have four more 260Z motors around and our engine guy will build these up as spares. One IT motor for Jeffery, then two spare short blocks, maybe even long blocks if we have the parts. The bearings etc. are relatively cheap and maybe having the insurance around means I won't have to use it!

    Ron

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    That's interesting on the valve lift. Was that for emissions purposes? How much effect does the lesser amount of lift have? Minimal?
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Not sure, I'm betting some emissions crap.

    That is about 4% less lift, so it'll have some effect for sure. Cam duration is longer though, but not very much. That would also effect cylinder filling of course.

    It is what it is. I have to run it so worrying about what it doesn't do won't help too much


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    66

    Default

    Read the section of the manual on the idle circuit, it may help some. Mine is still pig rich at idle, but it doesn't foul plugs.

    I am told that there is only one cam avail from Nissan, and as they know how to play the game, it is superseeded sp? to allow the 240, 260, 280's to use it. You might want to check it out.

    I am having a heck of a time getting time to work on mine. I'll be spending this weekend in a maximum security prison, Alexander Correctional Institute in Taylorsville NC this weekend as part of a Kairos prison ministries team. Next week I am hosting a training class at work with folks from here and Europe, and then traveling to England in three weeks for a meeting. Still trying to hit VIR in Oct. but since I had more time I now have delrin outer lower control arm bushings in the back and a tubular swaybar, well almost a swaybar. The arms aren't done yet. If I would just leave this beast alone I would be fine!!!

    Mike

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Red face

    Hi Mike,

    I spoke with Riely at Lynchburg Nissan and the 260Z cam is still available. It costs over $450, but you can still buy them brand new.

    He also indicated that Nissan has not and will not supersede that part even if the camshaft were no longer available. It has different specs than the 240/280Z cams so Nissan will not replace it with a 240/280Z cam, the 260Z cam will simply be discontinued.

    Now, he also went on to say that back in the day a popular cheat for the 240/280 crowd was to run the 260Z cam. He recalls a few fellows being busted with the 260 cam in their 240/280 cam cars. I don’t have any experience with that, but just passing on some information.

    So, the 260Z cam is still available from Nissan therefore I do not think you can move to a 240/280 cam.

    Sorry to hear about all the work going on - and not on your car!!! I hope you can make the VIR race. I am planning to and hope to have an enjoyable time just before the enduro.

    Ron

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Acworth, GA USA
    Posts
    455

    Default


    Now, he also went on to say that back in the day a popular cheat for the 240/280 crowd was to run the 260Z cam. He recalls a few fellows being busted with the 260 cam in their 240/280 cam cars. I don’t have any experience with that, but just passing on some information.

    [/b]
    Uh, I have some experience with that. Perhaps I should Ebay the Appeal

    The so called "C" cam appeared largely in the 260Z, but as we documented, with sworn affidavits from original owners, it also appeared in some 1973 model 240Z's. As did just about every other letter of the alphabet. You really have to Cam Doctor it to be sure. There is no Nissan documentation (that'd be nada, zero, zip, nyet) that relates the stamp on the back to a particular grind. There are also about 12 different grinds of the so called "A" cam. We think this was due to variations in the machinery and vendors making the cams. The differences are subtle. Regardless of the reality, SCCA, largely due to our infamous case, has decreed that an "A" is a 240 cam and a C is a 260 cam. I guess the grind is free, just put the right stamp on the back.

    "So, the 260Z cam is still available from Nissan therefore I do not think you can move to a 240/280 cam."

    Even if it was unavailable the "A" does not supercede, so SCCA expects you to find one in a junk yard. Uh, or grind off the A and stamp a C, but you didn't hear that from me.

    FWIW, after SCCA rendered our cam, lash pads, small combustion chamber E88 head casting, trailer, beer cooler, and girlfriend's thong "OUT OF COMPLIANCE", we went back to a junkyard "A" cam in an E31 head and went 2 seconds a lap faster at Roebling Road the next race. Then won 10 of 10 the next year. Take that, Jim Creighton. &$%#@.

    Point is there's not enough difference in any of them to move you on the grid, so don't fret and sleep well all you "A" cammers.

    katman

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Uh, I have some experience with that. Perhaps I should Ebay the Appeal

    FWIW, after SCCA rendered our cam, lash pads, small combustion chamber E88 head casting, trailer, beer cooler, and girlfriend's thong "OUT OF COMPLIANCE", we went back to a junkyard "A" cam in an E31 head and went 2 seconds a lap faster at Roebling Road the next race. Then won 10 of 10 the next year. Take that, Jim Creighton. &$%#@.

    Point is there's not enough difference in any of them to move you on the grid, so don't fret and sleep well all you "A" cammers.
    [/b]
    Dang, I didn't know you fellows had all that trouble with them. I looked at the specs on the cams and the 8 degrees doesn't seem worth much at all. But it appears there is more to cam and year than simply the wisdom of a "C" cam is 260Z, and "A" cam is 240Z.

    Now, the E88 head is what I have to use on the 260z and I thought it was a bit worse than the E31 head, at least by simply looking at them. Was it a preferred race head back in the day? I've got a bunch of them around in case people decide a 260Z is the Z the race! Ha ha on that one, but it is fun having a red headed step child.

    I'm sure the "A" cam folks will be quite happy as I've not seen any of us "C" cam folks threatening them for Z car dominance on the track. At least not yet......

    Ron




  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Rock Hill, SC USA
    Posts
    370

    Default

    Now, the E88 head is what I have to use on the 260z and I thought it was a bit worse than the E31 head, at least by simply looking at them. Was it a preferred race head back in the day? I've got a bunch of them around in case people decide a 260Z is the Z the race! Ha ha on that one, but it is fun having a red headed step child.

    Ron
    [/b]
    Ron... There are two distinctly different E88 heads. According to NISMO the production dates for the "early" E88 are 9/71 thru 6/72. These have a smaller combustion chamber than the "late" E88's. They were and still are the preferred unit for the 240Z. They're just getting harder to find. ( If you have one that you can't use let me know!)

    Steve
    Steve Parrish
    57 ITS Nissan 300ZX

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    So the duration is more important than the lift apparently?
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    66

    Default

    Thanks for the clearification. The info I had came from a guy I went to drivers school with years ago, a 240 guy. Oh well! Another reason that these cars are the bastard child of the the Nissan family!

    I hate it when work interferes with my hobby, but I knew that going into the new job. It will all work out for the best in the end. Sometimes I have to be patience, one of my areas for improvement!!!!

    Hope to see you up there.

    Mike

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Try and make it, might have a few Zs there for Goblin's Go!

    The 260Z cam only has 8 more degrees duration for intake and exhaust, not very much. I imagine if one were to measure all the intake lobes of a cam you might get that much standard deviation in cam lobes. I also bet it is hard to find a cam that has every lobe within a say 5% tolerance for lift and duration. Doesn't sound like it'd be worth it to cheat for that but racers are racers everywhere!

    Everything we've got in the piles of 260Z parts are C cams it appears, the correct ones. However, the street motor of the car we went to the crusher has a "C" and "A" mark on it, clear as day. And if that car wasn't a stock motored street car (tag titled last in 1981) I don't know what was - it was all street and all stock to the exhaust manifold bolts, radiator, everthing. And one of the motors from Rex's cast offs has a "C" cam that is drilled hollow like the 240/280 cams.

    Riely had not heard of a drilled "C" or a "C" "A" cam.

    Jeff came over and worked hard, much thanks, and the motor is in! Should fire up in a day or two then take it out to a parking lot to run it around a bit. I hope she'll run well!

    Ron

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Steve, thanks for that piece of information. I thought E31 heads were the 240Z head to have. I had no idea that E88 heads were made earlier than 74.

    So basically I can run any E88 head then? Not sure as the 260Z was only for 74, looks like I'd be stuck with later E88 heads.

    I've got a bunch (four) E88 heads. How can I tell the difference other than measuring the combustion chamber? Do you know what a "good" head chamber cc's out to stock?

    Ron

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Rock Hill, SC USA
    Posts
    370

    Default

    [quote]

    I have a book from Nissan Motorsports that lists the chamber volumes as:
    E31 42.4cc
    Early E88 44.7cc
    Late E88 47.8cc
    Take these numbers with a grain of salt as they were published as part of a Big Bore Kit. Until I can verify them I would just use them to represent the ratios of the 3 heads. Maybe we could ask Riley?

    In any case I think you'd be restricted to the late E88 since it was the only one that came on the 260. Using an earlier head could throw off your max compression from the spec line in the GCR.
    Steve Parrish
    57 ITS Nissan 300ZX

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    Keith, have read your posts with great interest over the last few years.

    It seems to me that in sum, with a Z car, there are a few keys to speed:

    1. Use throttle as an on/off switch.

    2. Get car to handle, especially with rear grip, so that you can do (1).

    3. For power, the key is timing and carb (especially piston dampening) work on a dyno.

    On base? Off base?
    NC Region
    1980 ITS Triumph TR8

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Good info Steve, thanks for that.

    I (we) don't know what I've got, just that the compression is ~0.1 below the max I gave the engine shop that did the work, which was 0.5 over stock per max allowable IT rules. I'll call them and see if he has the cc measurement, I'm sure he does. I could then ID it to make sure it is a late head.

    I agree with you in that the late head would be the only one for me. That is fine, we've got a lot of them if they were stock on 260Zs and we've got five of those motors now. I don't think the head has trouble making the 0.5 over with the stock pistons.

    So with the smaller size of the E31 head do Z guys not prefer that? Or do I have something wrong? We had a E31 head that we sold (I think to Ty, can't remember) that came with the 260Z that Jeff Rousell is now building. I guess the previous owner was going to put the E31 on when he got around to it, but that project died and Jeff and I bought it for $600, car, parts, and all.

    Ron

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Los Lunas, NM, USA
    Posts
    682

    Default

    We had a E31 head that we sold (I think to Ty, can't remember) that came with the 260Z that Jeff Rousell is now building. [/b]
    Nah, it wasn't me. You did sell me one of your extra gearboxes, though.

    The only E31 head I have is sitting with a 240 block that I'm saving for when I have to build a new car. I've now got a nice 240 tub waiting. Hopefully that won't be too soon.

    Now, to get started on my new motor. Have to start with a 'fresh' block this time; the one we put in last month isn't salvagable. Although I looked around near turn 2, I couldn't find all of the pieces of the block to take to the welder.

    Who'd you borrow that torque plate from again Ron? I think I need a new engine builder.
    Ty Till
    #16 ITS
    Rocky Mountain Division
    2007 RMDiv ITS champion

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Albuquerque
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Now, to get started on my new motor. Have to start with a 'fresh' block this time; the one we put in last month isn't salvagable. Although I looked around near turn 2, I couldn't find all of the pieces of the block to take to the welder.[/b]
    Hey Ty, check with Nancy, the sound Nazi, I think she may have some of those missing pieces...
    ITS 240-Z #50
    Rio Grande Region

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •