September fastrack

[77ITA]

The SOHC Neon is definitely too fast to be an ITB car.

On another note, I was very surprised to see only two people besides myself wrote letters in protest of the suggested "open engine management rules". I've heard a lot of negative opinions on this topic, so don't forget to put your pens to paper if you have strong opinions on the topic.

SM guys, what is the story with the '94 flywheel?

[Andy Bettencourt]

SM guys, what is the story with the '94 flywheel? [/b]

The 94 flywheel is slightly heavier than the 95-97. There is an allowance in SM for the 94's to run the later flywheel. The later flywheel is all that is produced now and has superceeded the early one. That request baffled the SMAC because essentially, the requestor was asking for it to be made legal for teh later cars to be able to run the heavier, rarer, and out of production flywheel. Why would anyone want that? We think it was a confusion in what is currently legal.

[Greg Amy]

The 94 flywheel is slightly heavier than the 95-97.[/b]

It just gets betterer 'n betterer...

[Joe Harlan]

It just gets betterer 'n betterer...
[/b]

[Rabbit07]

The SOHC Neon is definitely too fast to be an ITB car.

[/b]

I think that after I went from 12th to 6th in the Sunday IT Fest race, there isn't going to be much happening for Neons in the near future. I believe that I have finally shown that it can be competitive.