Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 41

Thread: Battery question

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    statesville, NC USA
    Posts
    167

    Default

    Need to buy a new battery for the 944. How 'similar' does my new replacement battery need to be? Some of the gel 'automotive' batteries are very small.
    1984 Porsche 944 ITS #54

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA
    Posts
    1,381

    Default

    Instead of one of those racing batteries (Odyssey/Optima, for example), I got an AGM battery of the same group number as the original wet cell. Hard to believe there could be any concern about that.

    Josh Sirota
    ITR '99 BMW Z3 Coupe

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Nebraska City
    Posts
    223

    Default

    Need to buy a new battery for the 944. How 'similar' does my new replacement battery need to be? Some of the gel 'automotive' batteries are very small.
    [/b]
    How is a gel battery even remotely "similar" to the wet cell that was O.E. on you car?

    However, this is a "grey area" that I have NO expert knowledge or experience regarding.
    Dave Webb
    Bare Bones Racing
    '84 VW GTI
    #17 ITB

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Wheaton, IL
    Posts
    1,893

    Default

    e. Any ignition system which utilizes the original distributor for spark timing and distribution is permitted. Internal distributor components and distributor cap may be substituted. Crankfire ignition systems are prohibited unless fitted as original equipment. Any spark plugs and ignition wires may be used. Ignition timing is unrestricted. Batteries may be replaced with those of alternate manufacture provided they are of similar amp-hour capacity and weight and are fitted in the standard location. Additional battery hold-down devices may be used, and are strongly recommended. Cars originally equipped with two (2) 6-volt batteries may replace them with one (1) 12-volt battery installed in either of the original battery locations.

    This is why it is fine.
    Chris Schaafsma
    Golf 2 HProd

    AMT Racing Engines - DIYAutoTune.com

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Nebraska City
    Posts
    223

    Default

    I stand corrected then because I thought the reason one would chose a gel battery is for weight reduction.

    Is there another reason?
    Dave Webb
    Bare Bones Racing
    '84 VW GTI
    #17 ITB

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Staying off the walls
    Posts
    1,049

    Default

    Maybe because you'd be hard pressed to find a wet cell battery these days?

    Tom Sprecher

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Wheaton, IL
    Posts
    1,893

    Default

    Gel batteries are much more durable in high vibration environments, and don't leak acid out when they get crunched....as much.
    Chris Schaafsma
    Golf 2 HProd

    AMT Racing Engines - DIYAutoTune.com

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    532

    Default

    Batteries may be replaced with those of alternate manufacture provided they are of similar amp-hour capacity and weight and are fitted in the standard location.[/b]
    IMO, this rule is so grey it's silly.

    The word "similar" is just too subjective to be meaningful in this context. If the original battery weighed 34 pounds, at precisely what point do you consider the replacement dissimilar? 32 pounds? 28 pounds? How about 15 pounds? Or, if you happen to admire the stock location of your battery (from a ballasting perspective), how about 58 pounds? Even at the two extremes mentioned, I can say they are "similar", because both batteries have mass of the same order of magnitude. And if it's the same size and shape as the original, mounted in the standard location, and has "similar" amp-hour capacity, seems to me you're good to go.

    Just out of curiosity... has anyone ever seen a protest written for battery weight?

    Gary Learned
    MiDiv
    Volvo 142E
    http://www.youtube.com/user/denrael

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Somewhere in Upstate New York
    Posts
    1,033

    Default


    Just out of curiosity... has anyone ever seen a protest written for battery weight?
    [/b]
    Please refer to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart's definition of "pornography".

    I sense another thread descending into the "color, texture & flavor" abyss.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Ligonier, PA, USA
    Posts
    1,676

    Default

    I stand corrected then because I thought the reason one would chose a gel battery is for weight reduction.

    Is there another reason? [/b]


    Wouldn't a gel battery be less susceptible to explosion, fire and leakage? This sounds like a saftey factor that isn't being considered by the ITAC or CRB. This might be a good rule to change.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    150

    Default

    From someone who bought a $90 Oddysey Battery for my SM (smaller than stock) and couldn't get myself to use it, I think my philosophy on this is that if I have to wonder if it's similar enough, it probably isn't.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA
    Posts
    1,381

    Default

    I recommend that people check out Deka batteries. They make AGM (Absorbed Glass Mat) batteries as direct-fit replacements for stock batteries (in some sizes). Same technology as an Optima, but in the stock form factor.

    Deka automotive batteries
    Josh Sirota
    ITR '99 BMW Z3 Coupe

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    alexandria, va
    Posts
    851

    Default

    just for reference in the bmw world of "similar" wet cell batteries that fit the stock battery hold downs..

    stock bmw battery for e36 (made by douglas) = 42.6lbs 750cca
    interstate mtp-91 replacement = 35.4lbs 700cca

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Beverly, MA, USA
    Posts
    112

    Default

    I think that if it is a similar amp hour capacity +/- 25% (yes I know this a big range), then I would have not issues. I switched to an Odyssey last year in my Integra. One for some weight savings (30lb stock, ~15 lbs Odyssey). However, the main reason I switched is for saftey of the closed cell design, no leakage if upside down or gets crushed, and have experience to prove. I hit a barrier diagonally 3 years ago on the front bumper and knocked the battery loose, acid got everywhere. Last year I had a hard front impact, the Odyssey has a metal casing that got bent in 2 places, bent the tie down bracket, and the wires got cut = no leakage.
    Victor

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA
    Posts
    1,381

    Default

    How is something that's 50% of the weight of the original "similar weight"?

    Josh Sirota
    ITR '99 BMW Z3 Coupe

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    alexandria, va
    Posts
    851

    Default

    How is something that's 50% of the weight of the original "similar weight"?
    [/b]
    it is not. i would say that one is not legal.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    just as an fyi, i looked up the battery for my car at autozone:

    http://www.autozone.com/servlet/UiBroker?U...UP%7C%7EBattery

    they are as follows with regards to warranty period in years, weight and price and cold cranking amps

    A. 6, 25.7, $49.99, 410
    B. 7, 28.1, $54.99, 425
    C. 8, 27.7, $79.99, 500

    since they are all listed as Group 51 replacements for my car, i would say that they are "similar"
    1985 CRX Si competed in Solo II: AS, CS, DS, GS
    1986 CRX Si competed in: SCCA Solo II CSP, SCCA ITA, SCCA ITB, NASA H5
    1988 CRX Si competed in ITA & STL

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,717

    Default

    Yes, but are any of those the optima style gel-cell and should gel-cell's not be allowed ( de-facto ) when they provide a clear safety benefit because they happen to be lighter? I know that as an ITE car i'm allowed more lattitude, but I run an optima group 52 in my car as there's not an optima that matches the stock style battery. Basically, it's close in size and shape but the battery posts are on the left side of the battery instead of the right side. I run the optima for two reasons, first my battery is in the trunk and I don't want acid or it's resedue back there, and secondly the optima is susposed to be more tollerant of vibration. As long as it close in size shouldn't it be legal? Anyone check out the add in Sportcar for the Carbon fiber battery's? How are you going to keep some one with more money than brains from doing something like spending several hundred on an ultralight battery because they think it'll give them 0.0002 seconds per lap? My Tirerack window banner's good for like about 0.5 seconds per lap If it looks like a normal battery size for the car, why worry about it?

    James
    STU BMW Z3 2.5liter

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA
    Posts
    1,381

    Default

    Interesting argument ... but there are ways to be both safe and legal. You just have to do a little more research. Sure, the "big two" -- Odyssey and Optima -- might not make batteries in the stock size and weight, but there ARE other companies that use these same technologies that do. I have an AGM (same as Optima) battery in my Z3 Coupe, that's exactly the same size as stock (Group 48), using the stock hold-downs. It's a couple of pounds heavier than stock. It's made by Deka (link above).

    The additional weight is fine for me since it's in the right place and I'm ballasting up to minimum anyway. But even if someone wasn't in that situation, the point is, that if you want a non-wet-cell battery that's actually legal, they can be found.

    BTW, I was forced into this battery by the rules. My stock battery location is inside the passenger compartment (in the floor of the hatch). It's exposed once you remove the trunk carpeting. The rules require a wet-cell battery that's in the passenger compartment to be in a marine-type container. But I could not find any marine-type container that could both fit a stock-sized battery AND still fit into the stock location. I bought and returned SEVEN different containers. So, I needed to find something that wasn't a wet cell, yet was of "similar" size and weight to stock. Naturally, I started with the big two, but came up empty ... it took a little research, but they're out there!
    Josh Sirota
    ITR '99 BMW Z3 Coupe

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    hampden,ma.usa
    Posts
    3,083

    Default

    Well that is interesting. According to Autozone there are 7 or 8 I could use for my car. Wet cells range between 28.1 pounds and 44.8 pounds and the optima is 43.8 pounds. That is a pretty big spread.
    dick patullo
    ner scca IT7 Rx7

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •