Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Piston Rule

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Andover, KS
    Posts
    121

    Thumbs up

    Section 9.1.3.D.1.j states "Factory replacement ppistons or their equivalent with the exception of diameter shall be used. Cast or forged equivalent pistons shall provide blah, blah, blah..."

    If the factory piston in my car are cast, does that mean my replacement "equivalent" pistons shall be cast or does that mean my replacement "equivalent" pistons may be cast or forged?

    Every time I read my GCR, I swear it was written by politicians...

    Paul Sherman
    Wichita Region
    '96 Neon #19 ITA (finally )
    Formerly known as P Sherm
    Joined 30 Sep 02
    Member No. 1176

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    A forged piston may be used provided it is exactly the same 'dimensionally' as a stock piston. So to use my car as an example:

    I have Mazda OEM factory replacement .020 over pistons. They are cast. If I wanted to go forged, they would have to be the exact same to be legal. Forging is just the method of manufacture. They need to meet all specs - ESPECIALLY WEIGHT - as stated in the rules.

    Mazda doesn't make a .040 over piston. So if I was to go .040, I would have to source the stuff with all the right specs - and be no lighter than the factory standard bore piston per the rules.

    Bottom line, the pistons need to provide all the same dimensions (except the increase in size obviously) as the stockers - and nothing can be lighter than the standard bore/factory OEM units or the factory overbore units.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    49

    Default

    hmmmm but, if i use .040 over piston and since mazda does not have them, how can i get the duplicate weight>>?? since i would think they would be heavier. bigger piston and all,,,,,, ??? or can i get make them as light as the standard OEM piston that i took out of the car ??


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Here we go again...


    (I STRONGLY suggest using the search function. Reason is, this was a SERIOUSLY contentious debate on this very forum not more than 6-8 months ago...I don't think any of us really want to go through this again...)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    hmmmm but, if i use .040 over piston and since mazda does not have them, how can i get the duplicate weight>>?? since i would think they would be heavier. bigger piston and all,,,,,, ??? or can i get make them as light as the standard OEM piston that i took out of the car ??

    [/b]
    That answer is specifically called out in the 2007 rule.
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    1,193

    Default

    Here we go again...
    (I STRONGLY suggest using the search function. Reason is, this was a SERIOUSLY contentious debate on this very forum not more than 6-8 months ago...I don't think any of us really want to go through this again...)
    [/b]
    I couldn't agree more...
    "Most people have the will to win, few have the will to prepare to win.” - Bobby Knight

    Bill
    Planet 6 Racing

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Tijeras, NM
    Posts
    579

    Default

    Bottom line, the pistons need to provide all the same dimensions (except the increase in size obviously) as the stockers - and nothing can be lighter than the standard bore/factory OEM units <strike>or the factory overbore units.</strike>
    [/b]


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    This argument last year was extremely ugly, resulted in a rule change.
    I&#39;ll leave you with a link to that prior topic:

    http://itforum.improvedtouring.com/forums/...?showtopic=6652

    ...and a verbatim quote from the new 2007 GCR (ITCS 9.1.3.j):

    "Engines may be bored to a maximum of .040 inch over standard bore size. Factory replacement pistons or their equivalent with the exception of diameter shall be used. Cast or forged equivalent pistons shall provide the same dome/dish/valve relief configuration, ring groove width and spacing, pin height relationship, weigh no less than the factory standard bore pistons. Piston rings are unrestricted."

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    OK, since there IS new wording in the GCR, I wanted to see if it&#39;s actually effective. A question from the last thread got some panties in a wad because the debate last year reallt did define for a lot of us how people torthure the rules to suit themselves.

    Engines may be bored to a maximum of .040 inch over standard bore size. Factory replacement pistons or their equivalent with the exception of diameter shall be used. Cast or forged equivalent pistons shall provide the same dome/dish/valve relief configuration, ring groove width and spacing, pin height relationship, weigh no less than the factory standard bore pistons. Piston rings are unrestricted.

    Here is how the new rule should apply:

    - Up to a .040 overbore is allowed
    - If overbore pistons are used, they shall be factory replacements or their exact equivalent, including weight
    - Those exact equivalents can be of cast manufacture or forged manufacture
    - If you overbore to a spec where there is no factory overbore piston, then your piston specs must be the same as stock, with the obvious exception of diameter
    - Factory replacement pistons must weigh what they weigh
    - Equivalent pistons must weigh NO LESS than the OEM standard bore pistons

    It&#39;s all in the rule. Is this how people read it or have I looked at it one too many times to have a clear view of what it actually says?
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA
    Posts
    1,381

    Default

    It&#39;s all in the rule. Is this how people read it or have I looked at it one too many times to have a clear view of what it actually says?
    [/b]
    Well, I&#39;m new to the rule, but that&#39;s what I think it says.
    Josh Sirota
    ITR '99 BMW Z3 Coupe

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    49

    Default

    THANKS ANDY AND AMY for your time and patience , im sure it clarified alot of questions, and as you said its in the rule book, just have read it a bit closer and slowly, thanks again

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •