I'm a little worried about Andy. He's beginning to sound like a surgeon, for whom every problem has a solution that includes cutting someone open. Not every issue we face can be fixed with an ITCS rule rewrite. The "rule" doesn't "suck" in this instance. The definition was written by human beings and served well up until about 36 hours ago. It's replacement might well be equally flawed.K [/b]
Or maybe what you ment to say was that nobody attempted to take advantage of the poor rule until now. At some point, the same thing happened with the 'alternate bushing' rule...and if we had been more proactive, it may have had a better outcome.

I liken this to guys who are competitive in underprepared cars in there Region - because ALL the cars are underprepared...just because someone hasn't brought a 10/10th car to the dance doesn't mean they couldn't have. Same with this rule...if it has read like this forever it doesn't make it a good rule.