Jeff,
i have never claimed that myself and the car cannot be made better. part of it is reluctance to put money in it if the thing is not going to be classed similar to other "like architecture" cars.
my primary frustration right now is primarily in the response of saying effectively "you missed the window" when i did not. then i received letters saying there would be response in this Fastrack when there was not.
whether or not this last rule request is approved, my original 2008 request (before the four years was up) should be considered.
i have won several regional races but then decided to try to try to step it up. i actually invested into a built motor. so instead of winning races at the tracks closest to me, i decided to go where there were more competitors, primarily the IT Spectacular (where i blew up the motor and caught the car on fire)and the ARRC. and since i am laying out more money for that track time and fuel costs, it has actually further restricted my track time to just those two races per year. so less money into car development and less seat time for me.
but it really isn't worth it to tow to Road Atlanta for the ARRC and try to learn a track on a once per year visit when i am also giving up horsepower to weight (imo since there is no real findings by the ITAC/CRB/BOD, etc.).
and this has been compounded with what i consider to be inconsistent (and imo, poor) policy decisions by the BOD with regards to H&NR makes it that much more frustrating.
sorry for the misc ramblings/rantings but it just seems like we keep getting close and someone pulls it away again. i'll play charlie brown to scca's lucy only so many times.
tom
Bookmarks