Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: January Fast Track

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA
    Posts
    1,381

    Default

    For whatever reason, downloads appear to be locked right now. I got the e-mail this morning but can't download.

    Were you able to download it?

    EDIT: Sorry -- it's working again!
    Josh Sirota
    ITR '99 BMW Z3 Coupe

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Ah, my favorite time in IT.com-land...!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Red face

    Not much IT specific.

    Now I KNOW I wrote one of the four ECU letters received and my name ain't Wire, so that means only two more letters were sent in support? After all the 10s of pages of posts written on this site about ECUs and only four total letters to the BOD? Seems a lot of folks talk a lot of talk but not many actually put pen to paper.

    Ron

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    - Fees for GCR 8.1.4 pre-approval/clarification on technical items cut in half...
    - SFI-approval on driver's suits *NOT* required for '08, but...
    - SFI approval on driver's suit required effective 1/1/09 (so much for "this is not what was intended" talk...)

    HAH! I love this one: they're already (surprise!) waiving the maximum number of races at the Runoffs to allow low-participation classes to go. However, GT-3 got the "yes" but GP got the "NO"!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    1,193

    Default

    Not much IT specific.

    Now I KNOW I wrote one of the four ECU letters received and my name ain't Wire, so that means only two more letters were sent in support? After all the 10s of pages of posts written on this site about ECUs and only four total letters to the BOD? Seems a lot of folks talk a lot of talk but not many actually put pen to paper.

    Ron
    [/b]
    It was approved by the BOD last FasTrack. Not much point in writing a support/hate letter now...

    Plus, mine went in awhile ago.
    "Most people have the will to win, few have the will to prepare to win.” - Bobby Knight

    Bill
    Planet 6 Racing

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Not much IT specific.

    Now I KNOW I wrote one of the four ECU letters received and my name ain't Wire, so that means only two more letters were sent in support? After all the 10s of pages of posts written on this site about ECUs and only four total letters to the BOD? Seems a lot of folks talk a lot of talk but not many actually put pen to paper.

    Ron [/b]
    Typically people only write in once. So if they sent in a objection or some support already, they often don't re-write.

    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Arlington, VA USA
    Posts
    515

    Default

    Yeah, I found it funny that they were already looking for ways to skirt their recently watered-down formula for excluding classes from the Runoffs. Add that the BoD passed a motion requesting the CRB "develop contingency plans for those classes that had 2007 participation levels from 20th to 24th, should they not happen to meet the criteria for an invitation to the 2009 Runoffs." What kind of contingency plan? Let them go anyhow (just like GT3)?

    And it looks like the '08 MX-5 was added to SSB with the much discussed MS-R option. So which happened first--this tech bulletin or the COA rejection of that "option"?
    Gregg Ginsberg
    '96 Civic EX -- MARRS ITA #72
    WDCR-SCCA Rookie of the Year 2003
    MARRS ITA/T3 Drivers rep

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    - SFI-approval on driver's suits *NOT* required for '08, but...
    - SFI approval on driver's suit required effective 1/1/09 (so much for "this is not what was intended" talk...)

    HAH! I love this one: they're already (surprise!) waiving the maximum number of races at the Runoffs to allow low-participation classes to go. However, GT-3 got the "yes" but GP got the "NO"!
    [/b]
    So I have until 1/09 to sew the SFI approval onto my suit? My wife will be happy.

    Ron

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Wheaton, IL
    Posts
    1,893

    Default

    GP did not meet the minimum numbers per event for a national class. However it appears that the probation period will be overlooked in this case as well.

    As we all know, the rules are only there for the times that they make it easy for the BoD to explain thier actions. The rest of the time they can be easily ignored by the PTB.

    It looks like we will be unexpectedly running a new engine development program and weight loss program in the production car.
    Chris Schaafsma
    Golf 2 HProd

    AMT Racing Engines - DIYAutoTune.com

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Concord, NH 03301
    Posts
    700

    Default

    BTW what is the typical turn around time for when letters get sent in vrs when they get acknowledged in the FT?

    I didn't send any jack point letters in this month, but got recognized for doing so. I did send in a resume, but that didn't get noted.

    Just curious.

    Matt

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •