***As to your hypothetical situation, I would imagine that such a set up would be ruled illegal under the "Serves an illegal purpose" clause, as it would be very easy to see and deduce.***

Jake, are you serious with your respones towards my firewall camber plate being illegal & the friken strengthing strut tower (ILLEGAL) camber weldment being legal. Whatever your drinking please change liquids because your sense of fairness is out of bounds. WHY ARE ALL OTHER CAMBER PLATES BOLT ON ITEMS ? ARE ALL THE OTHER CAMBER PLATE MANUFACTURES DUMB OR DO YOU THINK THEY ARE FOLLOWING THE RULES AS THE RULES ARE WRITTEN ?

Jake, along with the rear stays thet support the main hoop issue Bill mentioned the friken "X" that supports the main hoop is not within bounds of the rules because the "X" is made of three tubes, not two tubes as the written rule specs. Also as an member of the ITAC do you beleive that the "X" suport of the main hoop delivers the same strength support to the main hoop for driver protection that the two single tubes offer if installed per the recomended illustration in the GCR ?