Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: MkIII Cams?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Question for you ETKA gurus out there...

    Is there just one, or did MORE than one spec of cam come in MkIII Golfs? (Golves?) I'm talking among US-only, spec-line legal cars. I have evidence that seems to suggest the latter...

    K

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    New York, NY, USA
    Posts
    451

    Default

    Kirk,

    FYI. There are OBD1 and 2 cams listed. Got a cam doctor handy? Let us know the results

    Dave Z

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Flagtown, NJ USA
    Posts
    6,335

    Default

    Kirk,

    I'm pretty sure Dave is correct. The early Mk III cars were OBDI and the later cars were OBDII (IIRC, cutover was '96). It does beg the question though, at what point does it become a component of an assembly? I don't think you can mix and match them.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Wheaton, IL
    Posts
    1,893

    Default

    If there are two, either would be legal for either car, just like if there were two transmission gear sets either would be legal, or if there were two door configurations (aka small window/big window A2). The cam is not part of the engine management system so I would not think twice about choosing my favorite between the two.

    Chris Schaafsma
    Golf 2 HProd

    AMT Racing Engines - DIYAutoTune.com

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    ...but I've found the same cam (marked the same, same lift, no Cam Doctor so don't know much more yet) in both OBDI and OBDII cars, and a different cam in one - suggesting that the difference isn't so simple as "OBDI cam" and "OBDII cam."

    Is that VIN cut point on the ETKA page where the OBD transition happened? What does a page for a '93 or '97 car say, since there's no question that they would be just one or the other?

    Thoughts?

    K

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    High Point, NC
    Posts
    368

    Default

    Doesn't that ETKA page clearly show either in an ABA? What does our local dealership parts guy say, he should be able to interpret that.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    New York, NY, USA
    Posts
    451

    Default

    Info requested:

    Cam Part #'s per ETKA

    1993 048 109 101A OBD1

    1994>5 048 109 101D OBD1

    1996> 050 109 101A OBD2

    The split between OBD1 and 2 (mid 96 model year):

    Through serial # 107409 = OBD1

    From serial # 107410 = OBD2

    Now go measure those cams!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Flagtown, NJ USA
    Posts
    6,335

    Default

    Dave,

    What you're saying is that there are actually 3 different cams, TWO OBD 1 and one OBD 2. Is there anything different between the OBD 1 and OBD 2 heads?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    MD, US
    Posts
    1,333

    Default

    The major differenct I know with the OBD1 and OBD2 crossflow heads is emmisions port. On the OBD2 there is an emmisions port that you need to plug if you remove the air pump system. I wouldn't be surprised if they changed the cam to increase power and work with the new emissions either.
    --
    James Brostek
    MARRS #28 ITB Golf
    PMF Motorsports
    Racing and OEM parts from Bildon Motorsport, Hoosier Tires from Radial Tires

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    High Point, NC
    Posts
    368

    Default

    Not all OBDII cars have air pumps, just like not all OBDI cars had EGR valves, not that it really matters to us.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    New York, NY, USA
    Posts
    451

    Default

    FYI.

    Who is going to volunteer to test all of these in IT prep form?

    Some OBD1 heads are German castings (mine is) and all the rest are Mexican castings.

    Dave Z

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Walpole, Ma, USA
    Posts
    6

    Default

    The OBDII heads use only 1 valve spring. The OBD1 heads use the double springs like the MK1 and MK2 cars. I don't think you can mix and match within the rules.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    High Point, NC
    Posts
    368

    Default

    Right, the long block is an assembly, but if the cams each came in either, that would be another story, but I don't think so, I think you probably have only one legal choice for a camshaft in an OBDI head, OBDII there are two choices.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Flagtown, NJ USA
    Posts
    6,335

    Default

    If that's the case w/ the valve springs, I agree w/ you Cameron. But, according to what Dave Z. said, isn't it the other way around, 2 ODD I and 1 OBD II?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    High Point, NC
    Posts
    368

    Default

    I explained the whole question to my parts guru at the local VW dealer, he says acording to ETKA the OBDI cars never had the 050 cam, but some of the OBDII cars had the 050 and some had the 048. Acording to his interpretation of the information on ETKA. There are many reasons to prefer the OBDI engine, but it seems that the Camshaft just isn't one of them. That being said, prove me wrong PLEASE! I'd love to have the choice to run the other cam!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,181

    Default

    >> I'd love to have the choice to run the other cam!

    Do we know the specs on these cams yet?
    If somebody will send me cams I'll measure them and create a profile for each one.
    Bill Sulouff - Bildon Motorsport
    Volkswagen Racing Equipment
    2002, 2003, 2005 NYSRRC ITB Champs

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    High Point, NC
    Posts
    368

    Default

    The specs are on here:
    http://www.techtonicstuning.com/cams.asp

    The one listed for the G/J4 is also found in ODBII A3's


  18. #18
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    I confess that I'm not entirely confident about how the PN's that we have in the documentation line up with the physical specimens that we have, since there's no definitive markings on the castings. We were able to confirm that the lift values of the units we have in hand match the numbers in the TT literature but there's some supposition following that...

    K

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •