Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 37 of 37

Thread: wireing proposal

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    cromwell ct
    Posts
    746

    Default

    Just to stir the pot.......

    I'd love to know how many in the rules creep, purist category still have their speakers. I do- on the passenger side. Not on the drivers side because of cage clearance......

    Interesting

    R
    Rob Breault
    BMW 328is #36
    2008 Driving Impressions Pro-ITA Champion
    2008 NARRC DP Champion
    2009 NARRC ITR Champion
    2009 Team DI Pro-ITR Champion

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Greg, Did you buy your car new??[/b]
    Yup.
    ...were you able to get the NX2000 w/o radio?[/b]
    Yup. Ordered from the factory with no A/C, no radio, no t-tops, no nuthin'.

    'Course, since removal of the interior panels is legal, and speakers attach to the interior panels, it's a moot point on most vehicles. - GA

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Enfield, CT, USA
    Posts
    488

    Default

    I don't know Greg, the function of a speaker is obviously different than that of a door panel. And remember, just because a car faces a limitation like this (speaker mounted to door panel) doesn't mean you can force a legal mod (door panel removal) to facilitate an illegal one. I would say that if the speaker must remain and they are attached to the door panels then the panel, or a portion of it, must remain.

    Does this earn me my rules nerd membership?

    Oh, and that was a joke, but it does raise an interesting question.
    ~Matt Rowe
    ITA Dodge Neon
    NEDiv

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Somewhere in NC
    Posts
    969

    Default

    If the car was available without it as an option, you can take it out and leave what would be there if you bought it with radio delete package...nothing. I guess it is a good debate for a car you couldn't get w/o radio delete.
    Evan Darling
    ITR BMW 325is build started...
    SM (underfunded development program)
    SEDIV ITA Champion 2005
    sometimes racing or crewing Koni Sports Car Challenge

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Baton Rouge, La., U.S.A.
    Posts
    913

    Default

    This is the same argument made several years ago about cars like mine having rear window wipers. Some models did, some models didn't. Some people removed them, some didn't. The question of legality was never completely solved, just dropped. I suppose the consensus was that if you were beaten by a car that had no windshield wiper, was that the reason or only the tip of the iceberg.
    Chris Harris
    ITC Honda Civic

  6. #26
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Seems like there's a difference between a car that comes "standard" without a rear wiper, and ordering a delete option that leaves something off that is "standard." Or maybe not. What do I know.

    K

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    Matt,

    So you are telling me that when I replace my door panel with the allowable aluminum sheet, I have to find a way to re-install my speaker, window crank, arm rest, interior door handle, etc?

    AB
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Enfield, CT, USA
    Posts
    488

    Default

    Andy,

    As for the idea of the window crank, arm rest, handle etc, those are all specfically called out. So they are obviously legal to remove. But I can't find a place in the ITCS where it says it is allowable to remove speakers. If you can't remove them they have to remain in the car and in some cases the door panels also serve as a speaker mount. Removal of the panels in that case would be a situation of an allowed modification performing an illegal function.

    In reality though, the rule should just be changed to allow radio and speakers to be removed. Even the language in the TCS and SSCS does that. But it just goes to show how everyone seems to take some rules for granted.

    ~Matt Rowe
    ITA Dodge Neon
    NEDiv

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    hampden,ma.usa
    Posts
    3,083

    Default

    So what would it take to make this one small section of the rules simple.

    my original proposal
    Proposed wording lifted from A Sedan rules:

    For carbureted cars removal of wiring associated with a component which may be removed by these rules is permitted. All non-essential wiring may be removed. Existing wiring may be substituted.

    should all car be allowed to remove wiring associated with a component which may be removed by these rules. would this create a problem.

    how about all non-essential wiring may be removed.

    How about Existing wiring may be substituted as long as that substitution does perform any other function.
    dick patullo
    ner scca IT7 Rx7

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    2,555

    Default

    You're telling me that you had to check a box and pay more for speakers, on a base-model Nissan? 1966 Galaxie, I can believe that but Japanese-branded cars of that era??

    K
    [/b]
    Dealer option.

    I bought my 1991 Sentra SE-R new off the showroom floor with no radio or speakers.


    I don't know Greg, the function of a speaker is obviously different than that of a door panel. And remember, just because a car faces a limitation like this (speaker mounted to door panel) doesn't mean you can force a legal mod (door panel removal) to facilitate an illegal one. I would say that if the speaker must remain and they are attached to the door panels then the panel, or a portion of it, must remain.

    Does this earn me my rules nerd membership?

    Oh, and that was a joke, but it does raise an interesting question.
    [/b]
    Well, Greg doesn't have that worry since his car came w/o radio.

    However, if I had a car with speakers attached to the panels, I would certainly leave them attached to the panels......

    In the garage.



    In reality though, the rule should just be changed to allow radio and speakers to be removed.
    [/b]
    I heartily agree.

    But it just goes to show how everyone seems to take some rules for granted.
    [/b]
    Yep.
    George Roffe
    Houston, TX
    84 944 ITS car under construction
    92 ITS Sentra SE-R occasionally borrowed
    http://www.nissport.com

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    NNJR
    Posts
    514

    Default

    You're telling me that you had to check a box and pay more for speakers, on a base-model Nissan? 1966 Galaxie, I can believe that but Japanese-branded cars of that era??

    K
    [/b]
    I bought a 2004 Subaru Impreza STi that came with no radio or speakers from the factory except as an option - and very few came with that option almost all were delivered without the radio unless the dealer installed it.

    Also had an 86 Nissan with no radio or speakers new of the factory floor.
    Ed.

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,181

    Default

    I think you have an illegal hood scoop on the VW in that pic!!!!!
    edit your competition has an illegal hoodscoop!
    [/b]
    Finally somebody notices why I was being passed.

    Bill Sulouff - Bildon Motorsport
    Volkswagen Racing Equipment
    2002, 2003, 2005 NYSRRC ITB Champs

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    402

    Default

    Did anything come of this proposed rules change? It seems that wiring is the only major area omitted from the ITCS.

    The reason I ask is that I have to relocated my fuse panel as it is right where the required driver's side front down tube mounts. While I'm relocating the fuse panel I would like to replace my GBC type fuses with more modern ATC type.
    David Russell
    IT Volvo 242

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    hampden,ma.usa
    Posts
    3,083

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rsportvolvo View Post
    Did anything come of this proposed rules change? It seems that wiring is the only major area omitted from the ITCS.

    The reason I ask is that I have to relocated my fuse panel as it is right where the required driver's side front down tube mounts. While I'm relocating the fuse panel I would like to replace my GBC type fuses with more modern ATC type.
    No this request was rejected.
    dick patullo
    ner scca IT7 Rx7

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    That sounds so cold!!!
    Jake Gulick


    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    for sale: 2003 Audi A4 Quattro, clean, serviced, dark green, auto, sunroof, tan leather with 75K miles.
    IT-7 #57 RX-7 race car
    Porsche 1973 911E street/fun car
    BMW 2003 M3 cab, sun car.
    GMC Sierra Tow Vehicle
    New England Region
    lateapex911(at)gmail(dot)com


  16. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    hampden,ma.usa
    Posts
    3,083

    Default

    well
    dick patullo
    ner scca IT7 Rx7

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    yea, I saw that coming a mile away.
    Jake Gulick


    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    for sale: 2003 Audi A4 Quattro, clean, serviced, dark green, auto, sunroof, tan leather with 75K miles.
    IT-7 #57 RX-7 race car
    Porsche 1973 911E street/fun car
    BMW 2003 M3 cab, sun car.
    GMC Sierra Tow Vehicle
    New England Region
    lateapex911(at)gmail(dot)com


Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •