Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Exhaust coatings...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    I have a one-off header for my Miata getting built now and once it gets to me, I want it coated. A few options I have are:

    Jet Hot Coatings

    and

    Swain Tech Coatings

    and

    HPC HiPercoating

    There are others but these are the 'big' names I knew off the top of my head...any idea whose is best or can you throw a blanket over all of them?

    AB
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region 188967

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Concord, NH 03301
    Posts
    700

    Default

    From what I've been told, Airborne Coatings down in CT is one of the pioneers in this stuff.

    Certainly another one to consider, especially w/ your location. They are outside of Hartford. I had my Nissan done w/ it and I have no complaints about it. I have nothing to compare to however.

    Matt

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    2,942

    Default

    I would say that they are all fairly equal; try and save on shipping.

    I have had a Jet Coated header for about ten years.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    2,555

    Default

    Swaintech.

    I use Swain for all my coatings. Dan Swain is actually one of the true pioneers in this stuff. He's been doing it for over 30 years. Swain makes all their own coatings rather than using someone else's off the shelf coating. Dan is a ceramics engineer.

    Swain's is the only true thermal barrier coating for headers. Most are just ceramic paint. Swain's OTOH is very thick. It's also paintable. I have an SE-R header I had coated by Swain a few years back that I painted.

    Here's a couple of stories about their coating:

    1) Swain has an underground locomotive client who needed to lower their manifold surface temps from 975* to 425*. The client tried all the typical coating companies and the best they could get was around 775*. Swain's first attempt they hit 475*. On the second attempt they applied it a little thicker and nailed the 425*. That's a huge difference from the other coatings.

    2) I had Swain coat the manifold, turbine housing, and j-pipe on my turbo G20. I had lower under hood temps with this than I did when it was NA with a header with a conventional coating. No lie. The stuff is amazing.

    When you see ads for the typical coatings they will tell you that it's good for up to some temp. All they are telling you is at what temp it will flake off. Notice they say NOTHING about lowering temps.
    George Roffe
    Houston, TX
    84 944 ITS car under construction
    92 ITS Sentra SE-R occasionally borrowed
    http://www.nissport.com

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    boston, ma
    Posts
    211

    Default

    Airborne Coatings in CT does very nice work. More than just a ceramic paint and they are coated inside and out. A lot of well known header builders use them. And since they're local (for me) I would rather give the business to them.

    I've seen a lot of JET HOT coated headers that end up with the coating flaking off. They will recoat it for free as per there guarantee but it's such a PITA to do. I would just rather go with another company where the coating isn't going to flake.

    steve

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    2,555

    Default

    Originally posted by stevel@Nov 14 2005, 11:18 AM
    Airborne Coatings in CT does very nice work. More than just a ceramic paint and they are coated inside and out. A lot of well known header builders use them.
    [snapback]65329[/snapback]
    Not much more than ceramic-aluminum paint.

    From a performance standpoint, I'll stand by my statements. I'm familiar with Airborne and with Swain.

    Andy, call Swain and ask to talk with Dan or Richard. Tell them I sent you. You'll probably have to jog their memory - tell them I'm the guy who did the turbo G20 article for Sport Compact Car.

    George Roffe
    Houston, TX
    84 944 ITS car under construction
    92 ITS Sentra SE-R occasionally borrowed
    http://www.nissport.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Flagtown, NJ USA
    Posts
    6,335

    Default

    George,

    When you say that the Swain stuff is thick, just how thick are we talking about? It's my understanding that, whichever coating that you use, you want the inside of the tubes coated, as well as the outside. This will help delay (or prevent) the crystalization of the metal. If the Swain stuff is that thick, how much is it reducing the ID of the tubes?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    2,555

    Default

    Originally posted by Bill Miller@Nov 14 2005, 12:01 PM
    George,

    When you say that the Swain stuff is thick, just how thick are we talking about? It's my understanding that, whichever coating that you use, you want the inside of the tubes coated, as well as the outside. This will help delay (or prevent) the crystalization of the metal. If the Swain stuff is that thick, how much is it reducing the ID of the tubes?
    [snapback]65338[/snapback]
    Swain only coats the outside. You wouldn't want their coating on the inside. It's not only thick, it's rough as well. I don't remember the thickness, but it's obvious at the edges of mounting surfaces.

    The bottom line is, if you want a coating for increaed heat retention to promote scavenging, this the stuff.

    George Roffe
    Houston, TX
    84 944 ITS car under construction
    92 ITS Sentra SE-R occasionally borrowed
    http://www.nissport.com

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    150

    Default

    Originally posted by Geo@Nov 14 2005, 08:30 PM
    Swain only coats the outside. You wouldn't want their coating on the inside. It's not only thick, it's rough as well. I don't remember the thickness, but it's obvious at the edges of mounting surfaces.

    The bottom line is, if you want a coating for increaed heat retention to promote scavenging, this the stuff.
    [snapback]65345[/snapback]
    Their website mentions they do 0.015" thickness while most other people just do paint type stuff at 0.002"

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    358

    Default

    Originally posted by stevel@Nov 14 2005, 06:18 PM
    Airborne Coatings in CT does very nice work. More than just a ceramic paint and they are coated inside and out. A lot of well known header builders use them. And since they're local (for me) I would rather give the business to them.

    I've seen a lot of JET HOT coated headers that end up with the coating flaking off. They will recoat it for free as per there guarantee but it's such a PITA to do. I would just rather go with another company where the coating isn't going to flake.

    steve
    [snapback]65329[/snapback]
    I was happy with Jet Hot, but mine flaked of on the #1 pipe. After a good discussion with the HPC guys, I learned that the nice looking stuff looks nice because its aluminum flake - useless for the purpose of heat retention. You need the ugly rough stuff. Also, don't do the inside as it traps the heat between the layers eating up the steel. They also say don't wrap it after coating (which i was going to do). Best seems to be use stainless pipe and only coat the outside.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •