Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Dry Sump

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    58

    Default

    I looked at a car a week or so ago that had a dry sump. As I know little about them I would be interested in hearing some opinions regarding their usefulness.
    #63 ITB VW GTI
    #63 T3 Mazda RX8
    AZ & CalClub Regions SCCA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    532

    Default

    Errrr.... Dry sump? IT car? Last time I looked, dry sump systems were expressly forbidden in IT unless the car came with the system from the factory.

    Having said that, their usefulness is manifold... more horsepower, better lubrication, lower oil temps, etc.
    Gary Learned
    MiDiv
    Volvo 142E
    http://www.youtube.com/user/denrael

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    2,942

    Default

    Outside of IT...very useful.

    Reduces the oil in the sump, thereby reducing or eliminating "windage"--parasitic drag on the crank caused by oil roping around the crank from the sump.

    Has cooling benefits, also.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Somewhere in the swamps of Jersey
    Posts
    399

    Default

    A dry sump also allows the engine to be mounted lower in the chassis (lack of a bulky oil pan) for better CG, etc.
    Hero To The Momentum Challenged

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    58

    Default

    You are correct sir! This wouldn't be for IT. Disadvantages???
    #63 ITB VW GTI
    #63 T3 Mazda RX8
    AZ & CalClub Regions SCCA

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    Addtional costs ($$$) and complexity.

    Development time if someone hasn't already done it.

    Extra pumps that can fail.

    Extra lines that can fail.

    A belt that can fail.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Flagtown, NJ USA
    Posts
    6,335

    Default

    15-20 Qts of oil, per change, as opposed to 5-8. At $4-$8/Qt, that adds up.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,717

    Default

    Originally posted by GregAmy@Oct 27 2005, 09:00 AM
    Addtional costs ($$$) and complexity.

    Development time if someone hasn't already done it.

    Extra pumps that can fail.

    Extra lines that can fail.

    A belt that can fail.
    [snapback]63818[/snapback]

    Don't forget extra tank that can fail/ be puctured in off track incidents

    James
    STU BMW Z3 2.5liter

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    59

    Default

    Depending on the install and design there is a HP increase that come from the increase in crank case vacuum.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Staying off the walls
    Posts
    1,049

    Default

    Having dicked with a dry sump on a CFC I'll give you my $.02 in order of decreasing importance.

    Advantages
    1. Oil pump always has a steady supply of air free oil that is not effected by g-forces.
    2. Allows engine to be mounted as low as possible in the frame.
    3. You decide how much oil you want in the car (as little a 3 qt to a 55 gal drum if you wanted.
    4. You decide what pump, how fast you want to spin it, and where you want to scavange from.
    5. Little or no oil in the sump eliminates windage for more HP at high rpms.
    6. It looks cool

    Disadvantages
    1. Cost
    2. Weight
    3. Leaks
    4. Additional maintanence
    5. Complexity (more of everything like hoses, fittings, etc.)

    IMO without a doubt the best way to oil your engine on a car if you race. If it was legal in IT my car would have one.
    Tom Sprecher

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •