Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: My 240SX sounds like a TRACTOR???

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Renton, WA USA
    Posts
    1,625

    Default My 240SX sounds like a TRACTOR???

    Hey Guys,

    Time for me to draw from the wealth of knowledge out there...

    I finally got a header for my car this season... a Hotshot that I modified extensively at the collector to clean up the merge area...

    I installed it in my '97 240SX (completely ITS legal KA24DE... right down to the legal, bone stock 95-98 cams, etc...) using 2 1/4" pipe from collector to tailpipe... In the factory location, I placed a 12" Dynomax Bullet style muffler in 2 1/2".

    While I definatly have some power gains and the accelleration is noticably improved, the darn thing sounds like a Massy-Fergusen Tractor!

    I'm not sure if this is normal for these, as the previous Non-IT motor I had in the car had a 12:1 motor with different cams, so it had a higher pitched and more "revvy" exhaust note...

    I pulled the muffler off tonight to see if that was the cause, but it just made the same crappy sound, only louder...

    The engine runs well, though comments have been made that it sounds "flat" with this exhaust... The motor has about 9-hours of race-weekend driving on it, so it's just getting broken in... Compression works out to about 200psi on a compression check across all cylinders (stock bore, lightly cleaned-up head, etc...)

    Is the pipe too small? Is this the way these things sound?? I was kind of hoping for more of a "tuner" 4-cylinder revving to 7000 grand sound...

    Any thoughts?

    I'll post some links to some movie files shortly where you can hear for yourself...




    ------------------
    Darin E. Jordan
    SCCA #273080, OR/NW Regions
    Renton, WA
    ITS '97 240SX

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Los Lunas, NM, USA
    Posts
    682

    Default

    Well, I really know zip about the KA series, ad this may sound obvious, but did you do a baseline dyno before you modified the header or with the stock exhaust?

    My feelings on sound are, if it makes it past sound control, and it's working well, who cares what it sounds like. No one will comment that your car doesn't sound good if you beat them



    ------------------
    Ty Till
    #16 ITS
    Rocky Mountain Division

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Renton, WA USA
    Posts
    1,625

    Default

    Originally posted by x-ring:
    Well, I really know zip about the KA series, ad this may sound obvious, but did you do a baseline dyno before you modified the header or with the stock exhaust?
    Previously, the car didn't have a header, just a cast-iron manifold... Definite gains, and better revs up top...

    As for the not worrying about what it sounds like... Apparently, you don't have the racing buddies I do! They don't pass up one opportunity to RAZZ me!

    ------------------
    Darin E. Jordan
    SCCA #273080, OR/NW Regions
    Renton, WA
    ITS '97 240SX


    [This message has been edited by Banzai240 (edited October 22, 2004).]

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    2,555

    Default

    Must be the truck engine.

    Actually, are you certain there are NO exhaust leaks? Perhaps a crack induced somewhere in the merge collector?


    ------------------
    George Roffe
    Houston, TX
    84 944 ITS car under construction
    92 ITS Sentra SE-R occasionally borrowed
    http://www.nissport.com

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Posts
    1,191

    Default

    Darin - FWIW, all of the ITA 240s I've heard (while flagging) have had that 'distinct' sound. Never really occurred to me, but I guess you could compare it to your basic John Deer.

    ------------------
    Earl R
    Aspiring 240SX pilot

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Atlanta, GA usa
    Posts
    677

    Default

    Darin, I have had extensive sound level issues, so I now run a 2 chamber flowmaster muffler. It definetley quieted it down, but my car has never sounded flat like that. I watched a video tape this year that has me driving by at full accereration. I was amazed that the car sounded so "snarly" and "raspy". My advice, if it works, and you pass sound, just drive it.

    ------------------
    Tristan Smith
    Buffalo's Southwest Cafe
    ITA Nissan 240sx #56

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Concord, NH 03301
    Posts
    700

    Default

    Well, its a four cylinder...

    Seriously though, I have heard a lot of 4 cyl cars that go like stink but sound like crap, especially at low RPM. Friend's 240sx tends to sound rough at low speed.

    Listen to an older flat 6 porsche - sounds like a bucket of rusty bolts at idle, but better than any other race motor at full song.

    If it pulls well, just put in ear plugs, your pals will stop ragging you when you pass them!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Hubertus, WI, USA
    Posts
    821

    Default

    FWIW - Think about it....SRF's have a crappy exhaust note too.

    Volvo's aren't much better.....

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    cfr
    Posts
    391

    Default

    Darin,
    I don't have any experience with the 16 valve engines, only the 12's. I would think that you might benefit even more from a slightly larger exhaust (2 1/2 for sure, and maybe even 3 inch) I don't think that is the source of your tractor noise though.
    If you cut the collector off and welded/slid on a merge collector, check inside the merge, between the four pipes on the inlet side, for leaks. I have had them split there. Just a possiblity.
    How much vacuum does it pull at idle?

    Jim Cohen

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Renton, WA USA
    Posts
    1,625

    Default

    Originally posted by its66:
    I would think that you might benefit even more from a slightly larger exhaust (2 1/2 for sure, and maybe even 3 inch)


    ... How much vacuum does it pull at idle?
    I'm building a second system this winter of 2 1/2" pipe to test, but we feel that the 2 1/4" keeps exhaust velocities up to a reasonable level and helps enhance the "truck-like" features of the 4-valve motor...

    I'll have to do a vaccuum test too... don't have an in-car vaccuum guage, so I'm really not sure how much it pulls... Good Question I guess!

    ------------------
    Darin E. Jordan
    SCCA #273080, OR/NW Regions
    Renton, WA
    ITS '97 240SX


    [This message has been edited by Banzai240 (edited October 25, 2004).]

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    Lets talk headers. Darin, yours is a 4 into 1, right? What is the theory behind differing lengths and differing collector arrangements?

    Bikes (some) run 4 -> 2 -> 1 -> 2, and I have to tell you my Ninja with the Yoshimira pipe sounds so sweet...and LOUD, but sweet that I have so far held off onmy "Ducati dream"....

    You might look into the benefits of tuned lengths and different collector strategies.

    Also, perhaps there is something to be gained in expanding the pipe as you continue further back.

    PS>>>glad to see you working on your car, not just ITAC stuff. (I do appreciate the effort and time you put into the position, though. Thanks)

    ------------------
    Jake Gulick
    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    ITA 57 RX-7
    New England Region
    [email protected]

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Renton, WA USA
    Posts
    1,625

    Default

    Originally posted by lateapex911:
    Lets talk headers. Darin, yours is a 4 into 1, right?

    Actually, mine is a "tri-y"... 4 -> 2 -> 1 with 1&4, 2&3 y'd together...

    Has to do with evenly balancing the pulses at 180 degree intervals or something like that...


    ------------------
    Darin E. Jordan
    SCCA #273080, OR/NW Regions
    Renton, WA
    ITS '97 240SX


    [This message has been edited by Banzai240 (edited October 26, 2004).]

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Darin,

    try another muffler. It is a four cylinder and can be made to sound like any other four cylinder of similar displacement.

    I have this muffler on my 2.2L turbo Esprit, and it sounds quite nice. Used it on other naturally aspirated fours before and I think it is a fantastic muffler for the price and doesn't rob power.

    http://www.jegs.com/cgi-bin/ncommerce3/Pro...338&prmenbr=361

    Or look for Moroso Spiral Flow mufflers if the link doesn't work. I use a 3" on the turbo Esprit and will probably use a 2.5" on the JH.

    Ron

    ------------------
    Ron
    http://www.gt40s.com
    Lotus Turbo Esprit
    Ford Lightning
    RF GT40 Replica
    Jensen-Healey: IT prep progressing!

    [This message has been edited by rlearp (edited October 29, 2004).]

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Renton, WA USA
    Posts
    1,625

    Default

    Originally posted by rlearp:
    Or look for Moroso Spiral Flow mufflers if the link doesn't work. I use a 3" on the turbo Esprit and will probably use a 2.5" on the JH.

    Ron

    Interestingly enough, this was my next move... You can also find these called "Auger" mufflers. You can buy the spiral part seperately to fit inside a 3" or ??? exhaust tubing so you can make your own... Cheap to do, as the center section was only about $15.00 last time I checked...

    I'll let you know how it turns out...



    ------------------
    Darin E. Jordan
    SCCA #273080, OR/NW Regions
    Renton, WA
    ITS '97 240SX

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default


    ------------------
    Ron
    http://www.gt40s.com
    Lotus Turbo Esprit
    Ford Lightning
    RF GT40 Replica
    Jensen-Healey: IT prep progressing!

    [This message has been edited by rlearp (edited October 30, 2004).]

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    buffalo,n.y. u.s.a.
    Posts
    357

    Default

    Darin,

    Not the same motor, but the displacements are similar...

    On the 2.3 Liter Ford we were using a three inch exhaust at the recomendation of the header merchant. It went to the rear axle, with a "down turn", and no muffler.

    Wasn't "flat" sounding.

    Still interested in "Ford" talk?

    Write me.

    Bill

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Darin,

    The inlet and outlet of these things might be 2.5" or 3", but, the center section is more than 4.5" in diamter. So, I don't think you'd get the same flow by putting the sprial baffle into a 3" pipe. It's only $45 complete, bite the bullet and buy one! ;-)

    Ron

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Oregon City OR.
    Posts
    1,550

    Default

    The problem may be your engine builder has installed aftermarket muffler bearings in the thing....

    Oh and if you are gonna pit with me from now on you need to be wearing a straw hat for driving that tractor around.


  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    longwood, fl
    Posts
    250

    Default

    Joe,
    I've never had any problems using aftermarket muffler bearings, as long as they were the proper undersize, and have the extra oiling groove. Perhaps they were not broke in properly??
    All this tractor talk makes me think maybe Darin is planning a few "agricultural excursions".

    Jim

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Posts
    1,191

    Default

    Originally posted by ITA240:
    Joe,
    I've never had any problems using aftermarket muffler bearings
    Hey - are those IT legal? I might have to try them!

    Earl

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •