Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 41

Thread: Removing interior panels

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Camas, WA
    Posts
    531

    Default Removing interior panels

    Hello all,
    Can I legally remove the two interior panels covering the taillight housings? (First gen ITA car)
    I think its covered by D.9.F or D.9.G in the ITCS, but I'm not sure....

    thanks!
    Marcus

  2. #2
    Dick Elliott Guest

    Default

    MARCUS! I've removed those panels on every car since 84 and no one said a word. Go for it. When are you going to race the new RX-7? Take a look at www.russmarshall.com and look at where his panhard bar is. Couldn't be any lower. Off track would be a big no-no. Never had any problems with the KC boys, so don't sweat it. When are you going to update your web site with pictures of the new car? DICK.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Wauwatosa, WI, USA
    Posts
    2,658

    Default

    Opp's

    [This message has been edited by ddewhurst (edited July 23, 2005).]

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Wauwatosa, WI, USA
    Posts
    2,658

    Default

    Question by Marcus..........

    ***I think its covered by D.9.F or D.9.G in the ITCS, but I'm not sure....***

    Response by Dick.............

    ***I've removed those panels on every car since 84 and no one said a word. Go for it.***

    Real rule response by David....

    As you suggested Marcus. Part of Rule 9.F. reads: "All other interior trim panels, except the dashboard may be removed." Please see trim in the GCR glossary. Yes you may according to the rule/glossary remove your stated trim panels.

    Building by monkey see, monkey do method is not the sound legal method of building a race car.

    I am very curious how many races the Russ Marshal car did before the Panhard /frame went South. Where is Russ from ? The Southeast ?

    His car is toasted from Drivers side towards the passengers side. My toasted 1st gen from July 10th at the Farm is toasted the opposite way Passenger towards the drivers side. Anyone have a clue what the cost was if it was paided for ?

    Have Fun
    David



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Camas, WA
    Posts
    531

    Default

    Thanks Guys!

    Dick, I'm not sure! I've got to do some work to fix the front air dam, and go through the whole car. It also looks like it leaking copious amounts of oil. Depending on where the leak is, I'm hoping to have it ready for a test day in the beginning of September.

    I've seen Russ' site, that is insanely low!
    IIRC he is in the south east.
    I thin kin one of Rus's writeup on his crash he mentioned how much it was.

    Marcus

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Camas, WA
    Posts
    531

    Default

    and some pictures of it, alongside my P7:
    http://gcrall.miller-motorsports.com/image...asp?fldr=RX%2D7


    Marcus

  7. #7
    Dick Elliott Guest

    Default

    MARCUS! I've seen your new car run and it was very fast at the time. I see its got a knee bar. Hope your small. I see your Pro7 car has the dash bar up high. Good place if your like me and carry your own lead weights. Car was a front runner when I saw it. Should work for you very well. LOL, DICK.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Camas, WA
    Posts
    531

    Default

    Really? That's phenonmenal! Anything else you can tell me about it?

    Full disclosure time:
    I bought it off the Itforums classifeds page from John Reisert (user:"reisertracing" here on the IT forums). The transaction was smooth and painless on my end, thanks john!)

    What I know about that car:
    I know the late Jay Shadoan owned it, and it was a class champion at some point in its life.
    I know Charlie Clark built it, or had a hand in building it.
    Its obviously been crashed at least once in its life, hard. (The driver's side floor pan is bowed pretty good.)

    Parts:
    It has what looks like it has an ISC (could be kcraceware) 3rd link and what looks like a GC panhard rod. Tokico fronts and bilstein rears. Long dual primary exhuast, merging over the axle with an unknown brand of header.
    It has a dual coil ignition that bypassses the dist cap on the leading. I'm still trying to figure out if this is legal (help?).
    Safety devices cage, with some scary looking front footers. Maybe I'm worried about nothing, but I'm not sure how it would pass tech.
    It has an ATL fuel cell - I'm not sure on the tech issues regarding cells (Isn't there a 5 year limit on foam? or is the entire cell?)
    unknown spring rate, but its very stiff. much more stiffly sprung /damped (in the rear mostly) than my p7 car.

    And that's it.

    I'm aiming to have it done for the NASA 25 hours of Thunderhill, but it's going to be close. My bank account is not unlimited...

    Marcus

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Camas, WA
    Posts
    531

    Default

    Dick, I forgot about the knee bar.

    I carry my own lead weight! I love the high bar in the P7. I'd like ot move to a high bar style on the ITA car when my new cage is built, but the dash and such has already been cut for the low style.

    Marcus

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Wauwatosa, WI, USA
    Posts
    2,658

    Default

    ***It has a dual coil ignition that bypassses the dist cap on the leading. I'm still trying to figure out if this is legal (help?).***

    14.1.4.D.1.e.: Any ignition system which utilizes the original distributor for *spark timing* and *distribution* is permitted. Internal distributor components and distributor cap may be subsitiuted.

    Do you adjust your *lead timing* with the distributor ?

    Is your *spark distribution through the distributor cap with the plug wires attached to the cap* ?

    If you answer YES to both these questions you are legal to the rule in my humble understanding of the rule. Many people don't touch this rule/conversation with a 10 foot pole.

    I hope others post their understanding of the ruel. We all know of people who distribute this rule.

    Have Fun
    David



    [This message has been edited by ddewhurst (edited July 24, 2005).]

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Camas, WA
    Posts
    531

    Default

    Leading timing (I believe) is still adjusted via the distributor; I am still trying to figure out how it works...

    The trailing wire spark are still dristibuted via the cap.


    Marcus

  12. #12
    Dick Elliott Guest

    Default

    Crash couldn't be much worse than Russ's, and it got fixed. Cell life is only a recommendation by ATL. Pull the foam out and look at it. You'll know when it needs replacement. It'll start falling apart sooner or later. If it has dual pick ups, use both of them into a Moroso "Y" fuel block. Always did this and never had a problem sucking air in the turns. DICK.

    Originally posted by Marcus Miller:


    Its obviously been crashed at least once in its life, hard. (The driver's side floor pan is bowed pretty good.
    It has an ATL fuel cell - I'm not sure on the tech issues regarding cells (Isn't there a 5 year limit on foam? or is the entire cell?)


    Marcus[/B]

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Eden Prairie, MN
    Posts
    373

    Default

    I've got a question about the black car in the photos and I need a little rule clarification. In the photo you have the knee bar going across the dash which has had the lower middle part of the dash cut off and removed. Is this legal because of the bar, or is it not legal because, although the bar is there it's only legal to modify it, not get rid of it?

    Let's just say I know a guy who knows a guy who's really looking for a way to not go and buy a whole new dash. I know I've seen cars both ways several times so someone has got to have an argument for both. Sort of like this photo, but not really, I do have gauges in that part of the dash, so there is the argument about modifying the dash for gauges.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,215

    Default

    Marcus... It's called Direct Fire Ignition. There's plenty of info on it over at www.mazspeed.com in the forums and the legality has been hashed through a little here on IT.com a couple of years back...

    ------------------
    Scott Rhea
    It's not what you build...
    it's how you build it

    Izzy's Custom Cages

  15. #15
    Dick Elliott Guest

    Default

    Direct fire uses 3 coils doesn't it? Marcus said his car has dual coils. Sure sounds like direct fire though. Don't think 3 coils is legal. Maby the third one is hid under the dash with the NO2 bottle. DICK.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    120

    Default

    I put the fuel cell in that black car in the fall of 2000. jay was a nice guy and a heck of a driver.

    ------------------
    Nico Prelogar

  17. #17
    Dick Elliott Guest

    Default

    MARCUS! Ever talked to these guys? www.rx3mist.com/ 150+ in a stock body RX-3 in the 1/4. There out in your area.DICK.

  18. #18
    Dick Elliott Guest

    Default

    I had an ATL cell in my GT-2 RX-7 that was almost 20 years old and it never leak'd a single drop. Ever winter, I would remove the foam, flush out the cell with a ton or so of water, wipe it out, let it dry all winter, put it back together and race. Worked for me (ATL told me to do it that way) DICK.

    Originally posted by theenico:
    I put the fuel cell in that black car in the fall of 2000. jay was a nice guy and a heck of a driver.


  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Wauwatosa, WI, USA
    Posts
    2,658

    Default

    ***Don't think 3 coils is legal.***

    14.1.4.D.1.e.: *Any ignition system* which utilizes the original distributor for spark timing and distribution is permitted.

    Check the GCR glossary for the defination of *ignition system* & IMHU any number of coils may be used.

    Have Fun ; )
    David

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Wauwatosa, WI, USA
    Posts
    2,658

    Default

    ***In the photo you have the knee bar going across the dash which has had the lower middle part of the dash cut off and removed. Is this legal because of the bar, or is it not legal because, although the bar is there it's only legal to modify it, not get rid of it?***

    Ben, I'll do a little guess work on the high roll cage cross bar at the dash. The car is a 1984 or 1985 & by rule we are required to leave the lower portion of the DASH that continues around the shift levrer. If ya order a dash the part around the shift lever is one piece with the dash.

    Marcus, is the car with the lower roll cage cross bar at the dash one from the years 1981 through 1983 ?

    Now a question to Marcus, Scott or anyone else with FACTUAL knowledge. Is the lower stuff that attaches around the shift lever on a 1979/1981 through 1983 a continous part of the dash or is the part that attaches around the shift lever a seperate panel from the dash ? I know for FACT that the part that is around the shift lever on 1984 & 1985 cars is a continious part of the dash.

    Have Fun
    David


Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •