Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Tokico vs. Bilstein for 1st gen

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    38

    Default Tokico vs. Bilstein for 1st gen

    My Tokico's need replacement. What's the relative merits of Bilstein's for my set-up?

    I run 350F/175R springs, stock front swaybar, no rear swaybar, OEM Watts in rear (i.e. no rear panhard), Tokico dry settings have been usually #4F, #2 or #3R.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    Common wisdom is that 350 is at the limit for Tokikos. Not sure about the Bilstein upper limits. Any rebuildable shock would be more adaptable, IMHO.

    ------------------
    Jake Gulick
    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    ITA 57 RX-7
    New England Region
    [email protected]

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Oxford, Ct., U.S.A.
    Posts
    588

    Default

    Originally posted by Skid:
    My Tokico's need replacement. What's the relative merits of Bilstein's for my set-up?
    Bilsteins will allow you to run higher spring rates if you so choose.IMO the Bilsteins were also a much better damper than the Tokicos as far as feel and response to erratic driving maneuvers. Speak to Mike at ISC. He can give you more technical details on the Bilsteins.
    http://www.iscracing.net/suspension_2.htm
    Ray

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    38

    Default

    I'll talk to ISC but what kind of spring rates get run with Bilsteins? And what do you do for a wet set-up if they are non-adjustable?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Sylvan Lake, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Getting real technical here eh Mark ?? As you know, I also run the Tokicos, and prefer them simply because of the ease of adjustment. I also run the 350 / 175 springs. I think Steve ran 400 in front..

    ------------------
    G. Brooke Carter
    Wheat Buckley Racing
    # 10 Challenge Car
    2003 Class Champion
    Calgary, Alberta

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    38

    Default

    Hey BC, keeping you in sight let alone kickin' yer a** next year is going to take more than horseshoes and a good draft. Now don't you be poaching here on my battle plan!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Sylvan Lake, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Speaking of draft, we'll have a couple at the annual meeting on Saturday...

    ------------------
    G. Brooke Carter
    Wheat Buckley Racing
    # 10 Challenge Car
    2003 Class Champion
    Calgary, Alberta

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Oxford, Ct., U.S.A.
    Posts
    588

    Default

    I'll talk to ISC but what kind of spring rates get run with Bilsteins?[/B][/QUOTE]

    I ran 450lb fr and 200lb rear,Racing Beat fr swaybar, stock rear swaybar and panhard rod. A friend of mine used 600fr,225r and that worked pretty good also.

    Originally posted by Skid:
    And what do you do for a wet set-up if they are non-adjustable?
    Borrow some rain tires or leave it on the trailer I never change to a 'wet' set up and the fact of the matter is, when I ran the Tokicos, the front struts would always be set on 5 and the rears on 2 so the decision to go to a non adj strut was easy.
    Ray


Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •