Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 42

Thread: Clarification: Bumper lights

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,181

    Default Clarification: Bumper lights

    Correct me if I'm wrong...

    The way I read the rule...cars with integral lights IN the bumpers/bumper covers (not mounted on top or hanging below) must stay intact. You can only cover them. Correct, or did I miss a fast track somewhere?

    So these need to go back in...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Flagtown, NJ USA
    Posts
    6,335

    Default

    That's the way I read it.

    ------------------
    MARRS #25 ITB Rabbit GTI (sold) | MARRS #25 HProd Rabbit
    SCCA 279608

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    That's how I read it as well. However, I did replace the optional in-the-bumper foglights on my '96 GTI with the "dummy" inserts that came on non-fog versions. Not that I'm POSITIVE that any GTI's actually CAME w/o fogs... ...but the $80 that I got when I sold them on the 'Vortex offset the purchase of a toe gauge.

    K

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,181

    Default

    OK...




  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    665

    Default

    Ah, those must be the optional "black paint" (only) bumper lights

    Oh, wait a minute. If the "lights" were optional and only reflectors were standard, is the removal of just the reflectors permitted? I would not classify reflectors as "lights", although they might be required anyway. AFAIK, some of those "reflectors" barely even reflect, but are just there to cover up the unsightly tow hooks (hmmm, safety isuue?).

    [This message has been edited by Eric Parham (edited January 13, 2004).]

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Sorry, Eric - no rule that I know of gives permission to remove reflectors...

    K

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    NH, US
    Posts
    3,821

    Default

    I mentioned that to them... something about cost...

    not my class didn't care....


    Raymond

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Bridgewater, MA USA
    Posts
    1,300

    Default

    Just pulled a pic from the first race in April at NHIS - the debut of Brian's car - I must have been so mezmorized by the AWESOME paint and prep job he did, the front bumper holes got by me.

    Those DEFINATELY have to be AT LEAST covered by by rule should have the fatory piece in there AND taped. If that were legal, us RX-7 guys would be getting A TON more cool air into the intake on the passenger side right behind those lenses!


    AB

    ------------------
    Andy Bettencourt
    06 ITS RX-7
    FlatOut Motorsports
    New England Region #188967
    www.flatout-motorsports.com


    [This message has been edited by ITSRX7 (edited January 14, 2004).]

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    665

    Default

    I'm not exactly sure what I'm looking at (owned a 1st gen rx7 and miatas, but never a 2nd gen), but it looks to me like the "bumper" lights on that 2nd gen are simply taped over rather than removed. The lower opening seems to be an opening in the spoiler (not "bumper"), which should be okay. If we're talking about the upper slatted-look (grill?) opening, I have no idea what that's supposed to be or actually is, but it seems to be above the "bumper", FWIW.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Bridgewater, MA USA
    Posts
    1,300

    Default

    Eric,

    I posted the picture to illustrate the holes that 'could' be open should someone choose to ignore the rule in this thread. Both the clear lens and the directional have to be taped (the clear one has clear tape) and BOTH have to be covered per the rules as they are in the pic.

    AB

    ------------------
    Andy Bettencourt
    06 ITS RX-7
    FlatOut Motorsports
    New England Region #188967
    www.flatout-motorsports.com

    [This message has been edited by ITSRX7 (edited January 15, 2004).]

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    120

    Default

    Just for grins, does anyone actually know why Mazda put those clear lenses right in front of the retractable headlights?

    There is a clue in the question.

    ------------------
    Nico
    KCRaceware (816) 257-7305
    [email protected]

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Bridgewater, MA USA
    Posts
    1,300

    Default

    So you can 'flash' without having to raise the lights.

    AB

    ------------------
    Andy Bettencourt
    06 ITS RX-7
    FlatOut Motorsports
    New England Region #188967
    www.flatout-motorsports.com

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,181

    Default

    >> ... something about cost...

    Actually the 'in bumper lights' are VERY expensive and hard to find and WILL be broken. This is another silly IT rule, IMHO.

    - Bill

    [This message has been edited by Bildon (edited January 20, 2004).]

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Bridgewater, MA USA
    Posts
    1,300

    Default

    I see no problem with broken lights in the bumper. Tape them over and they serve the same function - NO FRESH air in the engine bay.

    AB

    ------------------
    Andy Bettencourt
    06 ITS RX-7
    FlatOut Motorsports
    New England Region #188967
    www.flatout-motorsports.com

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    NH, US
    Posts
    3,821

    Default

    Check out our sponsor Force 5 Automotive he has 4 or 5 that he is parting out. www.force5auto.com (they are not listed on his website but I have seen them, they are very clean cars, just worth more in parts than in whole)

    Chris Simple is the owner, he is a very reasonable guy, tell him we sent you.

    Raymond Blethen


  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,181

    Default

    Andy,
    If I had pop up lights I might feel the same way. However on my Golf the round Euro lights have been a constant source of pain. They are not a simple 7" US spec light and replacement isn't cheap or easy. However your point is taping them... you can tape the hell out of the lights but once they catch a rock (or an RX7 ) they cave in and are ugly and it eventually becomes impossible to tape over thin air.

    So while your solution seems logical..it doesn't really work.

    Sure I can continue to replace the lights after every few races. I understand the IT spirit And that I shall continue to do.

    - Bill

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Bridgewater, MA USA
    Posts
    1,300

    Default

    Here is my take:

    Put a blocking plate in there and tape over it. It would be a weenie protest if someone wrote papers. The point is not to drop weight and not to have extra air.

    If I was in your situation, I just might do the above.

    AB

    ------------------
    Andy Bettencourt
    06 ITS RX-7
    FlatOut Motorsports
    New England Region #188967
    www.flatout-motorsports.com

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,181

    Default


    Hmmmmmm. Nahh, I'll just run 'em and smash 'em.


  19. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    NH, US
    Posts
    3,821

    Default

    Andy-

    That might be acceptable at home (IE: around people you know) but don't plan on going to the ARRC or plan on winnng a protest. unfortunatly someone will argue that you gain a performance advantage with the lower weight of the thin cardboard (or whatever other material you use) instead of glass...

    I would think you would be found guilty as the line in the rules has to be drawn.

    PS: on the BMW don't play grey areas like that, I would hate to see Nick get booted for something so little

    Raymond

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Bridgewater, MA USA
    Posts
    1,300

    Default

    Raymond,

    Don't worry about our cars - they are LEGAL. We work day and night to keep them that way. The last thing you want to do is win and be found illegal - it takes away everything you have worked for.

    We are talking in the context of weekend to weekend Regional stuff here. I have said above, I would find one pair of lights, run them broken and keep taping them. Bill has stated they are ultra expensive and hard to find. In the real-world of local IT racing, providing a solution in the SPIRIT of the rules is a temporary solution.

    AB

    ------------------
    Andy Bettencourt
    06 ITS RX-7
    FlatOut Motorsports
    New England Region #188967
    www.flatout-motorsports.com

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •