Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: How many forum members does it take...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Daytona Beach, FL
    Posts
    132

    Default How many forum members does it take...

    Q: How many forum members does it take to change a light bulb?

    1 to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been
    changed

    14 to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and how the
    light bulb could have been changed differently

    7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs

    1 to move it to the Lighting section

    2 to argue, then move it to the Electricals section

    7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about changing light
    bulbs

    5 to flame the spell checkers

    3 to correct spelling/grammar flames

    6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb" ... another
    6 to condemn those 6 as stupid

    2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term
    is "lamp"

    15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "light
    bulb" is perfectly correct

    19 to post that this forum is not about light bulbs and to please
    take this discussion to a lightbulb forum

    11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all use light
    bulbs and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum

    36 to debate which method of changing light bulbs is superior, where
    to buy the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work best for
    this technique and what brands are faulty

    7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different light bulbs

    4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the
    corrected URL's

    3 to post about links they found from the URL's that are relevant to
    this group which makes light bulbs relevant to this group

    13 to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including
    all headers and signatures, just to add "Me too"

    5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they
    cannot handle the light bulb controversy

    4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"

    13 to say "do a Google search on light bulbs before posting questions
    about light bulbs

    4 to say we've seen this post here before.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Wauwatosa, WI, USA
    Posts
    2,658

    Default

    Colin, now it is your responsibility to accecpt all nominations for the clear winner to each of your mini topics & to post their names. & As we all know if a real signature name is not used for a thread the name has zero value & the no-name person SHALL not be accecpted as a nomimation.

    Have Fun
    David

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Wandering the USA
    Posts
    1,341

    Default

    Sad isn't it? Only 8% participation (192 of 2307 members). Shows how much work we've got to do yet to get people involved.



    ------------------
    Marty Doane
    ITS RX-7 #13
    CenDiv WMR

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    centerville, MN, US of A
    Posts
    135

    Default

    You forgot a couple guys to state that the light bulb was a safety issue to begin with, and that's why it burnt out. It should be replaced by dual 6 gigawatt halogen fixtures, and that doesn't constitute rules creep.
    M

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Orlando, FL, USA
    Posts
    2,322

    Default

    Originally posted by Colin Harmer:
    Q: How many forum members does it take to change a light bulb?

    1 to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been
    changed

    14 to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and how the
    light bulb could have been changed differently

    7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs

    1 to move it to the Lighting section

    2 to argue, then move it to the Electricals section

    7 to point out spelling/grammar errors in posts about changing light
    bulbs

    5 to flame the spell checkers

    3 to correct spelling/grammar flames

    6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb" ... another
    6 to condemn those 6 as stupid

    2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term
    is "lamp"

    15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "light
    bulb" is perfectly correct

    19 to post that this forum is not about light bulbs and to please
    take this discussion to a lightbulb forum

    11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all use light
    bulbs and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum

    36 to debate which method of changing light bulbs is superior, where
    to buy the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work best for
    this technique and what brands are faulty

    7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different light bulbs

    4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the
    corrected URL's

    3 to post about links they found from the URL's that are relevant to
    this group which makes light bulbs relevant to this group

    13 to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including
    all headers and signatures, just to add "Me too"

    5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they
    cannot handle the light bulb controversy

    4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"

    13 to say "do a Google search on light bulbs before posting questions
    about light bulbs

    4 to say we've seen this post here before.
    Me too.

    G


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Swampscott, MA
    Posts
    46

    Default

    Originally posted by Mark LaBarre:
    ... It should be replaced by dual 6 gigawatt halogen fixtures, and that doesn't constitute rules creep.
    M
    You forgot the 8 that will say using "halogen" as opposed to "standard" bulbs is cheating!

    just kidding! just kidding!

    This board is actually a civilized, well behaved board compared to some I subscribe to. There's one Model Airplane board that I frequent that makes this place look like a love fest! Really, you would think these guys (and girls) were arguing over... (you fill in the touchy subject; death penalty, spam, etc...).

    Jim


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    1,225

    Default

    Funniest post ever on this board!

    See, we can laugh at ourselves, can't we?

    ------------------
    Chris Wire
    Team Wire Racing
    ITS Mazda RX7 #35
    [email protected]

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Margaritaville
    Posts
    641

    Default

    Didn't we go through this already a short time ago?

    (sorry)

    ------------------
    Steve Linn
    '92 ITA Sentra SE-R
    www.indyscca.org

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    hampden,ma.usa
    Posts
    3,083

    Default

    Originally posted by Mark LaBarre:
    ...It should be replaced by dual 6 gigawatt halogen fixtures...
    If they want Halogen they should just go to production.
    dick

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    I hate to be the bearer of bad news but this is a great example of making the mistake of NOT buying a fixture with the bulb already screwed in. It's tons cheaper to let someone else take the initial depreciation hit on the bulb, and spend $$ and time on the labor.

    More fundamentally, it would be cheaper if the current rules interpretations didn't allow the bulb to be changed in the first place. Board posters are by nature competitive people so, once someone had light, everyone figured that THEY needed light too - whether that's true or not - and it became SOP. Now that everyone is doing it, organizational culture keeps us from undoing an allowance that shouldn't have happened int he first place.

    When will we learn?

    K

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Orlando, FL, USA
    Posts
    2,322

    Default

    Originally posted by Mark LaBarre:
    ...It should be replaced by dual 6 gigawatt halogen fixtures...M
    But only if they are "certified".

    Yes, I'm smiling. See:

    G


  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Somewhere in the swamps of Jersey
    Posts
    399

    Default

    Q. How many IBM software engineers does it take to change a light bulb?
    A. None, that's a hardware problem.

    Q. How many IBM hardware engineers does it take to change a light bulb?
    A. None. Change the standard to darkness, and upgrade the customer.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Swampscott, MA
    Posts
    46

    Default

    And we seem to have missed the most important piece of advice!

    "Don't spend your money on bulbs, it's better spent on seat time!"

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Somewhere in NC
    Posts
    969

    Default

    Originally posted by Team Rocket:
    And we seem to have missed the most important piece of advice!

    "Don't spend your money on bulbs, it's better spent on seat time!"
    unless its a night enduro

    Evan Darling
    ITA Integra


  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Atlanta GA
    Posts
    155

    Default

    And of course in response to a question about light bulbs you will get either a)RTFM(for older folks) or b)Google.com does wonders(for younger folks).

    ------------------
    Lance Snyder
    Atlanta Region F&C

    RIP Dimebag- August 20, 1966 to December 8th, 2004.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Acworth, GA USA
    Posts
    455

    Default

    Buy the high dollar, lasts forever, adjustable remote reservior light bulb so you never have to change light bulbs again. Oh, then wait for all the whiners to complain they're driving up the cost of lighting and outlaw them.....

    ------------------
    katman

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Flagtown, NJ USA
    Posts
    6,335

    Default

    And what about those poor saps that are driving older cars that can no longer get OEM lightbulbs, or worse yet, the OEM product was the light source referred to as 'candle'????

    ------------------
    MARRS #25 ITB Rabbit GTI (sold) | MARRS #25 HProd Rabbit
    SCCA 279608

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    centerville, MN, US of A
    Posts
    135

    Default

    Damn, this is a funny thread!!!

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Orlando, FL, USA
    Posts
    2,322

    Default

    Originally posted by Colin Harmer:
    Q: How many forum members does it take to change a light bulb?...
    1 to bring up the the subject of the ladder used to change the light bulb (lightbulb?).

    2 to question why the ladder should be an issue.

    6 to note that ladders of various technologies may provide a competitive advantage to the associated light bulb (lightbulb?)-changing team.

    4 to complain that the new digitized, carbon-fibre (fiber?) ladder, while compliant with the GCR, is not in keeping with the spirit of the class.

    At least 2 to complain about the escalating cost of racing.

    4 to say, "It happens, get over it."

    3 to claim that the new ladders will be the death of the class, and the end of civilization as we know it.

    (Isn't winter over yet?)

    G

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Wauwatosa, WI, USA
    Posts
    2,658

    Default

    ***(Isn't winter over yet?)***

    Not for those who were at Gingerman this past Sunday.

    David


Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •