Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 77

Thread: aerodynamics

  1. #41
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Originally posted by jhooten:
    How about this from the ITCS? "Any exhaust header and exhaust system may be used. ...."


    My point is that (a) there is no clause in the exhaust rule that specifically allows heat shields to be added, ( therefore, doing so hinges on the very open-ended statement allowing "any...exhaust system," so © putting a heat-shieldish looking thing that is NOT part of the exhaust system, hasn't got an ITCS leg to stand on.

    I think that's an example of the associative property of rules interpretation.

    K

    [This message has been edited by Knestis (edited June 22, 2005).]

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Hickory NC USA
    Posts
    233

    Default

    I use to race a rabbit GTI in ITB. I had such a box that was fitted behind the grill, IN THE ENGINE COMPARTMENT. I used a stock radiator. I ran this for two years. Our angle was the same as many of you, that it was in the engine compartment. Before I did this I talked to several techs about the definition of RAM AIR and they all said what I was doing WAS ram air even though I pointed out to those folks the GCR def. of RAM AIR. Everytime those techs got angry with me.

    At the time there were other famous ITB cars that ran a very similar setup. I ran that for two years until a race at Road Atlanta where they were checking people out for this very thing after a race and they got dqed. I know how the GCR is worded, I also think that it is not worded how they intended to be worded. I took my set up off my car. My general rule of thumb now is, if you have a question in your mind that you think it is not right, then it probably isnt. I would rather not have to worry about one techs interpretation vs. another ones. And after you have seen several dqed for the same thing you think twice.

    Derek Ketchie

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    I would disagree. I read the rulebook, and try to use it whenever possible to determine definitions that are related, and use the words and their meanings to form my plan of action.

    In a case like this, I would read the rulebook and the definitions, and make my mods. And I get DQ'ed at tech, because a tech official thinks that the "intent of the rule is bla bla bla, ...even though it says bling bling bling", then we have a larger problem that will most certainly get appealed most aggressively.

    It is up to the rules writers to write effective and clear rules that result in conditions that meet their intent.

    It is up to me to meet the letter of the rule, regardless of the writers intent.

    If they do their job well, we won't have any tech officials deciding what is, and what isn't meeting intent.

    In your case, it appears you were wronged by an over agressive rules interpreter.

    ------------------
    Jake Gulick
    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    ITA 57 RX-7
    New England Region
    [email protected]

    [This message has been edited by lateapex911 (edited June 26, 2005).]

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    7,031

    Default

    But we don't have all the information. The BOX may have been in the engine compartment, and the filter may have been in the engine compartment, but if it was flush up against the front - AND PULLED AIR FROM OUTSIDE THE ENGINE BAY, it doesn't matter where the set-up was.

    AB

    ------------------
    Andy Bettencourt
    New England Region, R188967
    www.flatout-motorsports.com

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    mayyyybe....maybe not! LOL...the rule is an intereting one from a definitions angle, I will say that!

    ------------------
    Jake Gulick
    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    ITA 57 RX-7
    New England Region
    [email protected]

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Flagtown, NJ USA
    Posts
    6,335

    Default

    I had heard of a guy named Kaz Busch who raced a swift in the NE, winning often, and getting protested so much he quit racing.
    The gentleman's name is Kaj, not Kaz, and he converted the ITB car to a G-Prod car and raced it for a couple of years. I'm not sure why he is no longer racing.

    ------------------
    MARRS #25 ITB Rabbit GTI (sold) | MARRS #25 HProd Rabbit
    SCCA 279608

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    hampden,ma.usa
    Posts
    3,083

    Default

    Originally posted by Andy Bettencourt:
    but if it was flush up against the front - AND PULLED AIR FROM OUTSIDE THE ENGINE BAY, it doesn't matter where the set-up was.
    Andy, I am not sure we have a concesus on that point yet. how many millimeters back does it need to be before you can say the air is being sourced inside the engine compartment. On the other hand one point your statement brings up is that a modification may be legal or not based on how well it is executed.
    dick patullo


    [This message has been edited by dickita15 (edited June 27, 2005).]

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    7,381

    Default

    <font face=\"Verdana, Arial\" size=\"2\">...how many millimeters back does it need to be...</font>
    Especially given - as far as I know - no engine air is created and/or stored inside the engine compartment, and must find its way into there from somewhere outside the compartment...

    This is a good rule where the intent should be codified. - GA

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    It could be argued that the air is "sourced" in California....

    ------------------
    Jake Gulick
    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    ITA 57 RX-7
    New England Region
    [email protected]

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Orlando, FL, USA
    Posts
    2,322

    Default

    Speaking of quotes, how about this one:

    "Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines." -- Enzo Ferrari

    G

  11. #51
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Warren, Ohio USA
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Not many cars have large enough "extra" holes in the core support to make your design practical, unless you leave something out of your core support assembly (like the air direction flaps that seal the radiator to the core support), which would disqualify your design.
    Renaultfool

  12. #52
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    187

    Default

    bill, did Kaj get protested on a regular basis? While he was in IT?

    Well, I've decided to just leave well enough alone on all this. I dont think it's needed for me to win anyways.

    All I need is about 10 or so more HP and some hoosiers, and I'll start winning...

    Cant be bothered with people protesting me, especially if the performance enhancement is so low...

  13. #53
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    newington, ct
    Posts
    4,182

    Default

    good idea.

    ------------------
    Dave Gran
    NER ITB #13
    '87 Honda Prelude si

  14. #54
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Flagtown, NJ USA
    Posts
    6,335

    Default

    Originally posted by zooracer:
    bill, did Kaj get protested on a regular basis? While he was in IT?

    Well, I've decided to just leave well enough alone on all this. I dont think it's needed for me to win anyways.

    All I need is about 10 or so more HP and some hoosiers, and I'll start winning...

    Cant be bothered with people protesting me, especially if the performance enhancement is so low...

    Kaj had already moved to Prod when I started racing the MARRS series. I don't know how often he was protested, but I can only remember one IT protest at Summit Point (based on parts) in the last few years.


    ------------------
    MARRS #25 ITB Rabbit GTI (sold) | MARRS #25 HProd Rabbit
    SCCA 279608

  15. #55
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Memphis, TN, USA
    Posts
    688

    Default

    A few weeks ago while I was in line at Tech, a last generation (I think) Prelude was getting its annual tech and had the hood up. It had an aftermarket air tube running from the top of the engine, where I assume the metering device is, to AND THROUGH the "floor" into the fender well forward of the tire, where I assume it had a filter. Is that the stock air-source location on a Prelude?

    ------------------
    Bill Denton
    87/89 ITS RX-7
    02 Audi TT225QC
    95 Tahoe
    Memphis

  16. #56
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Hickory NC USA
    Posts
    233

    Default

    Not sure which prelude you mean, but the ones I have seen do pick up their air from that exact point, through the fender in front of the wheel.

  17. #57
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    newington, ct
    Posts
    4,182

    Default

    I'm not so sure about that...My prelude (2nd gen) does have a tube go down in that location but at the end there is a resonator box. From what I understand I can not put the air intake there nor can I even remove the box. I would love to hear otherwise (and be legal)!!

    ------------------
    Dave Gran
    NER ITB #13
    '87 Honda Prelude si

  18. #58
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Somewhere in NC
    Posts
    969

    Default

    I believe you can remove the resonator box as it was part of the origional filter system (attached) but the filter needs to stay in its origional location...that is probably a cold air set up and im pretty sure they are not legal...anyone else??

    ------------------
    Evan Darling
    ITA Integra

  19. #59
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Hickory NC USA
    Posts
    233

    Default

    If the original air intake was in that LOCATION then you can do whatever you want with the intake, as long is it is FROM ORIGINAL LOCATION. It does not have to incorporate the original air box.

  20. #60
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    newington, ct
    Posts
    4,182

    Default

    The original air intake was NOT in that location. I have not personally seen this item protested in person but have heard of it being protested and it to be deemded illegal many times. (There have been several threads about this type of mod in honda-tech.)

    And to the best of my knowledge, it is not legal to take the resonator box out. I had orignally thought about cutting the end off in hopes of getting more air to the intake filter.

    ------------------
    Dave Gran
    NER ITB #13
    '87 Honda Prelude si

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •