Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 68

Thread: IT Car classifications now online w/stock HP

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Hubertus, WI, USA
    Posts
    821

    Default

    Lines 252 & 254.

    They use the same motor.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Richmond, Ca
    Posts
    531

    Default

    Jake, here are some requested updates.
    line 107, hp of the V6s were about 105 (2.6 was 106(8) and early 2.8 was 105


    line 157 Capri Stock hp was 100hp in 1971. It dropped by the 1974 year but... it doesn't matter.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA, USA
    Posts
    1,066

    Default

    Thanks JAKE!

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Kensington, CT, USA
    Posts
    1,013

    Default

    No problem. All updates up to here are in.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Wandering the USA
    Posts
    1,341

    Default

    Line 30
    ITS 86-91 RX-7 stock HP = 160.

    ------------------
    Marty Doane
    ITS RX-7 #13
    CenDiv WMR

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Concord, NH 03301
    Posts
    700

    Default

    for quick comparisons, it is really easy to just take stock flywheel #'s and call them wheel numbers. 15% loss through the driveline = 15% flywheel gain through IT mods. Not exact, but you're never going to get exact numbers. Skewed for the Wankels wankers, they respond much better to exhaust mods than the up & down guys.

    Nice work.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    195

    Default

    Originally posted by MMiskoe:
    ...Skewed for the Wankels wankers, they respond much better to exhaust mods than the up & down guys.

    Nice work.
    Jake -

    No "mods", but thanks ALOT for going to the trouble! (I always knew there was SOMETHING wrong, with me. I just never realized I was skewed! )


    ------------------
    Mike Spencer
    NC Region
    1986 RX-7 Build In-Progress
    1990 RX-7 Convertible In-Driveway

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI, USA
    Posts
    1,599

    Default

    Yow! I'm sure glad I checked in - you've got the ITS output listed in ITA for me. Line 122, the ITA (2.0L) 924 makes 115hp stock. The ITS 924S (2.5L) is listed correctly at 158hp.

    Cheers,

    ------------------
    Vaughan Scott
    Detroit Region #280052
    '79 924 #77 ITA/GTS1
    www.vaughanscott.com

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    Originally posted by MMiskoe:
    for quick comparisons, it is really easy to just take stock flywheel #'s and call them wheel numbers. 15% loss through the driveline = 15% flywheel gain through IT mods. Not exact, but you're never going to get exact numbers. Skewed for the Wankels wankers, they respond much better to exhaust mods than the up & down guys.

    Nice work.

    Here's the problem with that kind of thinking....

    A few examples...the Honda guys know that some models gain big, while others are just stones, no matter what you do to them.

    My RX-7 for example came with 100 HP from the factory, and can make (reportedly) 123 or so at the wheels. (It realy needs the exhaust mods...it is choked in stock form) Off the top of my head, that's about a 23% gain. But note that it is crank (SAE) vs. WHP...

    The CRX had, what 108 at the crank stock? And puts down 126 or so at the wheels. Thats about 17% or so. Again, crank vs. WHP.

    The E-36 ...stock, SAE crank is 189... WHP is 223. Thats 18%...(and crank improvement is more like 32%.... )

    And note that if we were talking crank SAE vs. crank SAE, the gains would be even stronger.

    Now other cars are not such over acheivers, and after all the mods, and the drivetrain tricks, end up putting down numbers close to stock, which is a gain to be sure, but a much lesser gain.

    It is just not safe to assume that you can apply a single factor and have any real idea of whats actually happening.

    The bottom line though, is, on the track, stock numbers don't really matter...whats coming out of the tire tread is what counts.


    ------------------
    Jake Gulick
    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    ITA 57 RX-7
    New England Region
    [email protected]

    [This message has been edited by lateapex911 (edited June 08, 2004).]

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Kensington, CT, USA
    Posts
    1,013

    Default

    Jake - nobody is disputing the fact that stock HP isn't going to perfectly relate to WHP. While it's not gospel, it is important information that is undisputable and we can get for all cars. Please lets try to keep editorializing to a minimum in this thread - we can open another one to debate. Keep the correction/additions coming. All updates in to this point.

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    Originally posted by Jake:
    Jake - nobody is disputing the fact that stock HP isn't going to perfectly relate to WHP. While it's not gospel, it is important information that is undisputable and we can get for all cars. Please lets try to keep editorializing to a minimum in this thread - we can open another one to debate. Keep the correction/additions coming. All updates in to this point.
    Absolutely, Jake. I finally was able to open the file and its an incredible peice of work. I just get scared when the 15% number gets trotted out as it is not that meaningful, and is kinda what got us here in the first place. Wanted to respond to that item, thats all.



    ------------------
    Jake Gulick
    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    ITA 57 RX-7
    New England Region
    [email protected]

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Hubbard, OH, USA
    Posts
    260

    Default

    Cool list. I wonder if you could add a columns for drive type front/rear, engine placement, and or factory weight distribution?

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    2,555

    Default

    Originally posted by Jake:
    Jake - nobody is disputing the fact that stock HP isn't going to perfectly relate to WHP. While it's not gospel, it is important information that is undisputable and we can get for all cars.
    Actually, it is disputable. For starters it's pretty well known the Bimmer's stock bhp is understated. Further, there have been some well publicized cases in recent years of manufacturers overstating their bhp.

    I'm not trying to take away from your work in any way. Let's just understand the nature of the data we are working with.

  14. #34
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Feb 04 FasTrack updated the years of the MkIII Golf (your line 218) to include '94-97 models.

    K

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    137

    Default

    Jake,

    Ford Fiesta (Not Festiva) 63 whoppoing HP from the factory.

    Good work on this, nice to have a quick link to this info.

    Thanks,



    ------------------
    JJ
    #62 ITC

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Canton, GA.
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Jake,

    Great work on the Excel spreadsheet! I've got a couple modifications for you.

    Oldsmobile SCX (cell D46) reads 155HP the Quad4 W41 is actually rated at 190HP stock.
    Oldsmobile Calais (cell D47) reads 160HP once again the Quad4 W41 is rated at 190HP stock.



    ------------------

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    newington, ct
    Posts
    4,182

    Default

    The Fiesta's HP number is really interesting! 63 HP? Jake, what are we doing wrong then?

    ------------------
    Dave Gran
    NER #13 ITA
    '87 Honda Prelude

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Bridgewater, MA USA
    Posts
    1,300

    Default

    Line 15: Contour non SVT - 170hp
    Line 11: SOHC Neon ACR - 132hp
    Line 41 and 42: 300ZX's - 160hp
    Line 66: Volvo - 168hp
    Line 118: 88 Fiero V6 - 135hp

    AB

    ------------------
    Andy Bettencourt
    FlatOut Motorsports
    New England Region
    www.flatout-motorsports.com

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    18

    Default

    Nice job, thanks!

    The ITA Fiero 1985-87 and 88 all had the same HP, 135.

    The ITB Fiero 1984-87 had 92 HP. The '88 ITB Fiero has 98 HP stock.

    The disc brake for the '88 ITB is wrong. They have the same suspension including brakes as the '88 ITA.

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    106

    Default

    Jake

    I am a little reluctant to give you all my information that I have found on the IT cars simply because it has taken me a long time to compile it all. I have however asked my Dad and brother for advice on this subject and both have given me the go ahead.

    Where my data comes from-

    My dad collected Road & Track from around 1964 to 1997 in this collection most IT cars are included. In 1987 Road & Track went down hill and stopped covering low end cars as well. So from 1988 to present I get most of my information from msn.com and cross reference as best I can will Road & Track. I am only telling you this so you trust the data I give you.

    Often in your data you are giving cars more power than I do. I am taking this as a guide to me to do more research on these cars so I will not include them in what I give you. I am only going to give you what you do not have and where I have found higher HP ratings.

    I hope this information is useful to you.

    ITS
    Line 33- 150hp
    Line 35- 170hp
    Line 49- 150hp
    Line 50- 175hp
    Line 55- 188hp
    Line 56- 135hp
    ITA
    Line 69- 115
    Line 72- 129
    Line 73- 125
    Line 76- 115
    Line 78- 135
    Line 84- 110
    Line 87- 119
    Line 88- 119
    Line 95- 102
    Line 102- 110
    Line 105- 102
    Line 107- 110
    Line 108- 101
    Line 110-119
    Line 111-110
    Line 113-140
    Line 116-113
    Line 119-140
    Line 120-86
    Line 127-116
    Line 134-96
    ITB
    Line 139-116
    Line141-129
    Line142-129
    Line143-102
    Line151-90
    Line153-98
    Line157-102
    Line158-102
    Line159-92.5
    Line162-115
    Line164-102
    Line165-100
    Line166-102
    Line171-104
    Line176-110
    Line177-98
    Line180-98
    Line181-97
    Line182-100
    Line183-102
    Line186-97
    Line187-97
    Line189-90
    Line190-102
    Line191-75
    Line192-105
    Line193-75
    Line194-96
    Line200-72.5
    Line201-95
    Line202-115
    Line203-128
    Line204-115
    Line205-115
    Line206-100 my old car
    Line207-70 this is the one time I will say you have it to high because I am sure you do.
    Line208-97
    Line209-96
    Line210-95
    Line212-116
    Line213-105
    Line215-75
    Line217-90
    Line228-114
    Line229-98
    Line230-105
    ITC
    231-62
    232-96
    233-72
    234-81
    235-70
    236-88
    237-67
    238-75
    239-94
    240-96
    241-45
    242-1780lbs (2003 GCR) 90hp
    243-76
    245-58
    246-70
    247-70
    248-95
    249-68
    251-52
    252-63
    253-67
    254-70
    258-68
    259-80
    260-70
    261-65
    262-68
    263-70
    264-65
    265-62
    266-50
    267-81
    268-62
    269-80
    270-65
    271-70
    272-96
    273-69
    274-67
    275-69
    276-70
    277-77
    278-80
    280-64
    281-77
    282-64
    283-77
    284-58
    285-60
    286-70
    287-88
    289-58
    290-73
    291-68
    292-60
    294-78
    295-78
    296-55

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •