Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Gearboxes - got to be easier than last discussions

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default Gearboxes - got to be easier than last discussions

    I noticed that early 240z cars had four speeds. My JH is a four speed, and I'm having a hell of a time getting a five speed from anyone.

    Does anyone run a four speed? How do they do? My ratios would be horrible I think, but just looking to see if anyone else does it as well? Or, do folks not race the early 4 speeds and do a later model with a 5 speed?

    ------------------
    Ron
    http://www.gt40s.com
    Lotus Turbo Esprit
    BMW E36 M3
    RF GT40 Replica
    Jensen-Healey: IT prep progressing!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    2,555

    Default

    240Zs should only have a 4-speed since that is all they came with. Did the JH (as classified) ever come with a 5-speed?


    ------------------
    George Roffe
    Houston, TX
    84 944 ITS car under construction
    92 ITS Sentra SE-R occasionally borrowed
    http://www.nissport.com

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    yep, in 75

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    2,555

    Default

    Originally posted by JeffYoung:
    yep, in 75
    Show me a 75 240Z and I'll show you an illegal car. The 240Z was only produced until 73.

    [edit]: Or do you mean the JH? Of so, go ahead and install one!

    ------------------
    George Roffe
    Houston, TX
    84 944 ITS car under construction
    92 ITS Sentra SE-R occasionally borrowed
    http://www.nissport.com

    [This message has been edited by Geo (edited September 23, 2004).]

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    The 5 speed JH is definitely legal, I was just wondering if anyone ever ran 4 speed boxes at all, or, rather, were forced to?

    R

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    665

    Default

    Not my personal experience, but I understand that 4-speeds are sometimes run for one or more of the following reasons:

    1) reduce weight
    2) reduce rotating inertia
    3) reduce friction
    4) reduce cost or complexity
    5) take advantage of shift-linkage geometry for 3-4 which is often less awkward than 4-5.

    For example, I've heard that some ITC VWs run the 4-speed with a taller R&P instead of the 5-speed with a shorter one and find it quicker at both NHIS and/or Lime Rock. In that particular case, I believe that the 5-speed has the same ratios as the 4, except for a closer 5th tacked on (and an optionally shorter 3rd for the 4-speed).

    Keep in mind that we really only use two gears at most tracks, most of the time. So some would say "why lug around the extras?"!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    Here is what I have:

    4 Speed Ratios Speed Difference
    3.12 42.28
    1.99 66.29 24.0
    1.30 101.87 35.5
    1.00 131.92 30.0

    5 Speed Ratios Speed Difference
    3.37 39.17
    2.16 61.07 21.9
    1.58 83.49 22.4
    1.24 106.30 22.8
    1.00 131.92 25.6

    The 5 speed is just dang hard to find. Twice I've entered into deals to buy a used one from someone to have it fizzle. I have two four speeds however, and they are reported to be MUCH stronger since they were made by Chysler and served duty in much heavier cars.

    What does anyone think about the ratios, henious?

    Ron

    [This message has been edited by rlearp (edited September 23, 2004).]

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    LOS ANGELES CA AMERICA
    Posts
    370

    Default

    Didn't the Jensen-Squeely use a Getrag (same as BMW) at some point?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    raleigh, nc, usa
    Posts
    5,252

    Default

    Yes, that is the '75 model I was referring to above. It had a 5-speed Getrag box that lots of people we talked to said is rather weak.

    Ron, looking at those ratios again, it just looks like 2-3 is too long. At VIR, you spend a lot of time accelerating from say 70 to 110 or so. Looks like that is all going to be third gear, and with a peaky four cylinder, you are going to be starting way low on the tach in 3rd.

    I know availability is an issue, but I'd go Getrag if you can. Was that box used in a BMW from the mid-70s? If so, maybe you can find and use one.

    Jeff

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    I'll check and find out. Getting a 5 speed from a JH Preservationist is not easy. These are the same people that paid me $114 for two sun visors, remember? Now that "feature" of the JH is NOT working in my favor on a gear box.

    Ron


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    hampden,ma.usa
    Posts
    3,083

    Default

    ron
    i would plan to build the car with the 4 speed and keep looking for a deal a 5 speed. the top gear ratios are the same so this will not hold up the build. find out the top speed for a ITS car at the tracks you are going to run and pick you rear end gear from that as low (or high numericaly as possible). it remains to be seen if the power band will be to narrow with this gear box.
    when you set your cam timing go for a wide power band
    dick patullo

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    Take a look at Gear Crasher gear charting software from DaveSport...

    http://www.davesport.com/cgi-bin/davesport...t/software.html

    It's pretty slick.

    K

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •