Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 34

Thread: Designing sway bar - very upset!

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default Designing sway bar - very upset!

    I can't for the life of me find my C. Smith "to Win" books, four years and two moves after I last saw them! This is getting VERY serious...

    Can someone out there help me out with the formula for tubular anti-roll bar rates, while I decide where else I might look - or if I need to order new copies.

    Thanks

    K

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA, USA
    Posts
    1,066

    Default

    Kirk,

    Neither Tune or Engineer to Win give a formula...perhaps Prepare (which I don't have)

    For a solid bar:

    Rate (Pi * G * D^4)/(16 * B^2 * L)

    Where G= Modulus of elasticity of material

    D= Diameter of Bar

    B= Length of lever arm (measured 90 degrees to length of bar---not along the lever arm) Adjacent not Hypotenuse

    L= Length of bar

    4130 C34-C38 has a G of 1.2 x 10^7

    I obtained this formula from a suspension engineering class I took years ago--pre FSAE type programs.

    You will be guessing on the modulus of elasticity, so perhaps this will get you close enough to at least get the right OD bar...you can then tune with the lever arm. Geometry of the links and mounting bushings will also effect things, but at least it will be a good starting point.

    Perhaps ADDCO has a site with a formula or a sprint car website/chat forum might be of some help.

    on edit--for a hollow bar my notes say to substitute (O.D.^4 - I.D. ^4) for the "D^4" in the solid bar formula.

    Using a 1" solid bar vs 1" hollow w/.125" wall gives a change of about 40%


    Happy engineering!

    Daryl DeArman


    [This message has been edited by Quickshoe (edited May 18, 2004).]

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    kansas city mo
    Posts
    466

    Default

    I had trouble finding the books...A couple of book stores told me that they where out of print...I even gave them ISBN numbers. I finally got a good person at Borders and they where able to find me the book.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Trussville, Alabama, USA
    Posts
    1,087

    Default

    Steve Smith autosports has them..

    ------------------
    Chuck Baader
    E30 ITA under construction
    Alabama Region Divisional Registrar

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Locust Grove, VA, USA
    Posts
    528

    Default

    [quote]Originally posted by Knestis:
    K,
    Now why in the world would you want to know which sway bar to use. Are you not stuck with the one that came with your showroom stocker?
    Really a pleasure meeting you and your wife at VIR, K.
    G

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Woodstock, Ga USA
    Posts
    139

    Default

    I am considering hollow sway bars for my car to lose weight. I have removed every legal item, and am still 108 pounds over. The problem is that I am getting conflicting information. My fabricator tells me that a hollow bar is torsionally stronger than an equal diameter solid bar. Roland de Marcellus, in his book “Handling What It Is And How To Get It” states that a hollow bar is approximately 65% less than the same size solid bar. Who’s right? The weight savings from two one inch solid bars would be substantial.

    Chuck
    S.E. Region
    #34 ITA

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Roanoke, VA
    Posts
    173

    Default

    I am considering hollow sway bars for my car to lose weight. I have removed every legal item, and am still 108 pounds over. ... The weight savings from two one inch solid bars would be substantial.

    Chuck
    S.E. Region
    #34 ITA
    [/b]
    If I read this correct, you have done everything legal to reduce you weight, and now you are looking for "other opportunites?

    Just askin'
    Jim Politi

    Done some racin'.

  8. #8

    Default

    If I read this correct, you have done everything legal to reduce you weight, and now you are looking for "other opportunites?

    Just askin'
    [/b]
    It sounded more to me like he has unbolted every legal item to lose weight, and now is starting to think about replacing components with lighter but still legal components. Perfectly legal and WELL within the spirit of IT!
    Bowie Gray
    ITA Miata


  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    665

    Default

    Kirk,

    I don't have my books nearby, but here's an idea: Assuming Daryl's formula is correct for a solid bar, just do 2 calculations.

    That is, do one calculation for a solid bar with the same OD as the proposed hollow bar, and do a second calculation for an imaginary solid bar that would fit inside the hollow bar (OD of imaginary bar is ID of hollow bar). Then subtract the two numbers to get your resulting stiffness...

    And, I might add, please make it MUCH stiffer before taking any more cornering pictures or I might get seasick

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    665

    Default

    Chuck,

    It all depends on WHAT they're made of. Assuming exactly the same materials (unlikely), a hollow bar of exactly the same OD will be a little softer than a solid bar. But, A hollow bar can be made with a slightly larger OD to have the same stiffness as the solid bar while saving weight.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    14

    Default

    You already know what the lightest,stiffest bar is,so what is the issue? Do you think you can make a lighter effective bar?

    Dick Shine

  12. #12

    Default

    Substitute (D^4 - d^4) for D^4 in your formula above and it will work.

    D = outside Dia.
    D = inside Dia.

    I believe I got this from an old Steve Smith book. I just happen to keep that formula in a little notebook I always seem to have handy

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Hendersonville, NC
    Posts
    174

    Default

    Gents,

    Another related question: What is the guideline for the ratio of spring rate to sway bar rate? I am undergoing the same exercise and don't eally know what spring rate to design the sway bar to.

    And I guess as spring ate goes up, the ratio goes down???
    timo

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Raleigh, NC USA
    Posts
    425

    Default

    kirk,,

    i found it.......

    FWD=(rear bar as big as you can get it)/more rear spring
    Fred Alphin
    "Big leisure money seeker"
    #92 Hankook Tire soon to be ITB? ITA?
    Damn economy...

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    I can't see Texas from here!
    Posts
    206

    Default

    As far as the index of elasticity, I think you will find that there is such a small difference in the indices that the difference between mild steel and chrome moly will be so small that they will be inconsequential. It is the method and degree of heat treat that will make the difference.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    West Milford, NJ, USA
    Posts
    241

    Default

    You are right on, Mark; The STIFFNESS of chromoly is virtually identical to mild steel. What makes it useful is that it can deflect a great deal more before it plastically deforms. Essentially - it makes for a better spring. Remember though - it loses it's properties when welded - in fact, it becomes brittle if you don't anneal it, at which point, it is virtually identical (in the heat effected region) as mild steel. (assumming you don't then reheat treat the bar). Bottom line - only bother using chromoly if you are bolting together a swaybar.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    384

    Default

    back up from the dead !!!


    when calculating a sway bar like this(not my pic)


    what do you use for the lever arm length?

    is it from the center of tube to the mounting holes? what about it being mounted on both sides or is that negligible?

    thanks

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Rancho Cucamonga, CA, USA
    Posts
    1,066

    Default

    The lever arm length will be the distance from the center of the bar diameter TO the end of the arm that is providing the twisting force on it (trailing arm?).


    Daryl DeArman

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    IT.com "First Loser" Greensboro, NC USA
    Posts
    8,607

    Default

    ...and depending on what car it's for, you'll come back and want to do the math again for the additional rear bar.

    The answer to Shine's question above was, "The issue is it doesn't give us enough rear roll stiffness."

    K

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Black Rock, Ct
    Posts
    9,594

    Default

    Man, Dick had to wait a looong time for THAT answer, LOL!
    Jake Gulick


    CarriageHouse Motorsports
    for sale: 2003 Audi A4 Quattro, clean, serviced, dark green, auto, sunroof, tan leather with 75K miles.
    IT-7 #57 RX-7 race car
    Porsche 1973 911E street/fun car
    BMW 2003 M3 cab, sun car.
    GMC Sierra Tow Vehicle
    New England Region
    lateapex911(at)gmail(dot)com


Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •