How about a personal attack then so you know the difference?
I guess you also subscribe to Bill Clinton's defense of "what is sexual relations"? LOL :D
:dead_horse: :bash_1_: :bash_1_:
...
Type: Posts; User: Singletrack1
How about a personal attack then so you know the difference?
I guess you also subscribe to Bill Clinton's defense of "what is sexual relations"? LOL :D
:dead_horse: :bash_1_: :bash_1_:
...
No - his response was that as racers, we have to do all our own development. We have exactly 5 weeks to do the development and we have to do it on a part that he did not do the proper development or...
I'm not sure why you are bringing that back up. I think I have been civil and polite here. :D
I have made a simple request and you have now it turns ugly.
I believe there were pleny of mud...
I edited my original post to make it more clear.
1. My car and the other did not run at all past 3K RPM with the SIR in front of the HFM
2. The dyno runs on my car was done with the SIR after...
If you can publish the "process" in simple terms such as "weight * X /Y + Z = HP", that would be helpful. And some explaination of where X, Y, Z came from.
I think a simple summary would be...
But you are assuming the person who set the previous record had a full out effort in a 100% driver.
It also assumes driver is not a large factor.
If I add 300# and still get the track record...
If they would only publish the Math. :dead_horse:
I'm interested in the actual formula, not the end result. If the formula is fair and legit, why not publish it?
Bill
That is in direct contradiction to what David Finch told me when I told him about my dyno results. He stated it has to be in FRONT of the HFM to make the full 180HP. When I told him about my car...