Rear Control Arms???

Just wanted to get IT.com's views on something that I saw on another site about rear control arms...

In a nutshell, here are the arms:

Quote:

---

http://img2.putfile.com/thumb/12/35401455769.jpghttp://img2.putfile.com/thumb/12/35401455731.jpg
http://img2.putfile.com/thumb/12/35401455821.jpghttp://img2.putfile.com/thumb/12/35401455856.jpg
and another version:
http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d4...earsusp025.jpg
[/b]

---

which another poster posted a parts list here:

Quote:

---

Steel Swaged tube:

Swaged Steel Tubes: 5-8 SWAGE TUBE 17 IN 36187 14.95 59.80
Rod Ends: 1 2 X 5 8 MALE LH EML8-10 8.95 35.80
Rod Ends: 1 2 X 5 8 MALE RH EMR810 8.95 35.80
Lefthander Jam Nuts: 5-8 JAM NUT RH 0823105 0.85 3.40
Lefthander Jam Nuts: 5-8 JAM NUT LH 0823105L 0.85 3.40
Total 138.20 [/b]

---

and goes on to state:

Quote:

---

BTW: the $138 option I posted above are installed on four SCCA ITA winning racecars. I will admit they are the lowest cost option and you should use a seals-it on the rod ends, but they work great.[/b]

---

Legal??!!!????! IMO (which is not really all that educated on the suspension rules) the only bar that could be done w/ rod ends would be the fore/aft bar that goes to the bottom of the hub that might be considered a traction bar.

Argued at length in a Mazda thread I think. Ddewhurst has them (the control arms); his contention is they are traction arms and are free. Others disagree. Do a search; you should find it.

Hrmmmm.... hadn't thought of the old 1st Gen RX7 control arm/traction arm debate. Shame on me since I'm coming from a 1st gen rx7 :D

Quote:

---

...his contention is they are traction arms and are free. Others disagree. Do a search; you should find it.[/b]

---

If that's the case, I've got some significant improvements in mind for the NX...

<_<

The Mazda thread discussed logitudinal devices. These are lateral locating devices. Simply put, if I saw these on a car, the owner would really need to open my eyes...or the paper would fly fast. In other words, to my eye, clearly illegal.

However, I&#39;d LOVE t hear a well founded opinion in favor.....

concur..clearly illegal.

it they were legal every e36 bmw out there would have an adjustable lower rear control arm put in to replace the cheesy failure prone stock part....

darwin may come into play on the car in the last picture. love the bends around the pretty exhaust. can anyone guess how the failure wil occur in a hard right hander? :unsure:

I thought pics 3 and 4 were longitudinal? Or am I seeing it wrong?

Isn&#39;t the argument for laterals stronger though? Equivalent of a panhard rod or watts link?

Either way, I think both are illegal but let&#39;s hear the competing opinion again.

Quote:

---

I thought pics 3 and 4 were longitudinal? Or am I seeing it wrong?

Isn&#39;t the argument for laterals stronger though? Equivalent of a panhard rod or watts link?
[/b]

---

I think you&#39;re seeing the pics wrong... aren&#39;t the first 4 pics of the same car?

FWIW I wouldn&#39;t agree with your panhard rod or watts link equivalency:

Panhard Rod - Despite our somewhat weak definition in the GCR glossary, I&#39;ve never heard of that device as being applicable to anything but a solid axle suspension. The pics in this case seem to indicate we&#39;re working with struts (ergo independent suspension), right?

Watts link - By definition, it cannot be a watts link without a bellcrank, and there is no such animal in sight.

In any case, I&#39;m with you on the legality aspect. My opinion would be these are lower control arms (sorry... I&#39;m not buying the "lateral traction bars" argument), and there is no allowance to monkey with lower control arms.

Per the rule are they:

Anti-roll bars, Nope. :(

Traction bars, Nope. :(

Panhard bar, Nope. :(

I ain&#39;t going through the 4 link 1st gen RX-7 longitutal location/traction bars again, Yup. :) Oh, "Yup" means IMHU of the rules they are legal.

Have Fun ;)
David

Quote:

---

BTW: the $138 option I posted above are installed on four SCCA ITA winning racecars. I will admit they are the lowest cost option and you should use a seals-it on the rod ends, but they work great.[/b]

---

Shouldn&#39;t be too hard to find out who these people are that are running around with these parts.

The anodized blue bars look like tubular lower control arms to me. Are tubular parts stock on the car in question?

If not then those are purely illegal. And illegal as installed on "FOUR SCCA ITA winning cars". If I were in ITA I&#39;d be looking under some "SCCA ITA winning cars".

Thanks for the responses guys.

FYI, the arms in question are from a 1st Gen Neon. All 4 of the 1st pics are of the same car. The blue ones are just shown for a better pic of the setup and the only longitudinal arm.

I went through one of the other control arm topics here, but never saw a pic posted of the Suzuki Swift arms in question. I&#39;ll try and dig up a pic of the stock setup and see how they differ.

What forum did you find them on? does the owner know they are as illegal as counterfeit money?

They are not Legal. However I know of a few Neons out there that have them. I am not blowing the whistle on anyone, you know who you are. The stock piece is tubular and I have looked into installing sphericals in them, but there is an issue with the size of the bushing openning verse the fastener size. Now with the RX-7 or in my case the Mustang traction bars, totally legal the way I read the rule.

Quote:

---

What forum did you find them on? does the owner know they are as illegal as counterfeit money? [/b]

---

Here&#39;s a link to the thread. Warning!!! This link does NOT take you to a friendly, family-oriented, forum. :o

http://forums.neons.org/viewtopic.php?t=304950

The statement concerning ITA cars is about 20 posts in.

Well, the guy that makes a post about the arms being on the SCCA cars has a link in his signature to this car:

http://forums.neons.org/viewtopic.php?t=29...der=asc&start=0

So I suppose this is one of them huh?

LOL.... you guys are good!

Says he is Mike V from Schlitterbahn, TX. Page three of the thread has pictures of him with the ITA Neon.

Quote:

---

Says he is Mike V from Schlitterbahn, TX. Page three of the thread has pictures of him with the ITA Neon.
[/b]

---

Yep, haven&#39;t met him but did trade some posts on a NASA forum. Eyeing the new competition, I saw all those Neons at the SCCA school earlier this month but I did not personally meet Mike. They plan to run NASA PT and ITA as NASA SN was done away with. If he shows up later this month at our R/R I&#39;ll be sure to look a little closer at these cars. I do know he will be at a race in March.

Quoting Mike from his SN post... "It&#39;s all about perception, if nothing looks out of place nothing is."

Hmm, I&#39;m sure some local ITA drivers will be writing some protests.

Mark,
If you know how to contact him you should give him a heads up to this forum and that he probably should fix it BEFORE he runs ITA. (Could he run ITE with you?) I guess in PT it would just move him class wise. I don&#39;t know how picky the guys running SWDIV IT have been this past year as I only ran a couple of events, but that type stuff might draw a little bit of concern.
Mac

I read a post where "Mike V" was showing off an aluminum motor mount that he had bead blasted, then painted black...."so nobody will notice". It was pointed out that it is a legal part (update/backdate) and he responded with the above mentioned quote. Reminds me of the VW Vortex dude who bragged about his &#39;battery in a battery&#39; (sourced a "demo...[empty] case from Autozone)..lighter weight, you know, but it was pointed out to him that his DE or TT class allowed battery moves or mods....that made for some interesting internet backpedaling.

Somehow, when people start talking about "Drawing no attention", I get nervous, LOL.

But it&#39;s truly funny when people go WAY out of their way to pull off some sneaky (and often insignificant) cheat and then we find out the weren&#39;t bright enough to read the rulebook to find out it&#39;s actually legal. Accck!

He has also got system for live engine telemtry, F1 style. Interesting.

I&#39;ve got live engine telemetry:

1. Steam --- coolant leak.

2. Blue smoke -- oil be leakin!

3. Black smoke -- oil be leakin and burning!

4. White smoke -- damn Lucas crap!

5. Flame --- double damn that Lucas crap!

6. No engine noise -- sumptin broke!

7. Bad engine noise -- hold it down Captain, she ain&#39;t blowed up yet!

8. Good engine noise -- dude, this can&#39;t be right!

Jeff, you&#39;re a funny dude...

but you missed an antire genre of telemetry...smells!!!!

That&#39;s true.

1. Burnt smell -- damn Lucas crap! Prepare to eject!

2. Acrid burnt smell -- oil be leakin and burnin!

3. Eau de carbon metallic -- usin&#39; them brakes!

4. Burnt rubber -- usin&#39; them brakes too much!

5. stinky ass -- damn, should NOT have had those chicken wings and beer for dinner!

Quote:

---

Mark,
If you know how to contact him you should give him a heads up to this forum and that he probably should fix it BEFORE he runs ITA. (Could he run ITE with you?) I guess in PT it would just move him class wise. I don&#39;t know how picky the guys running SWDIV IT have been this past year as I only ran a couple of events, but that type stuff might draw a little bit of concern.
Mac
[/b]

---

I tried to PM him on a NASA board but apparently don&#39;t have the post count to PM, maybe someone else wants to refer him to this thread. I was going to give him a little heads up to "keep it clean" and that blatant disregard for the rules was not well recieved here or anywhere. Of course he can go ITE with me and I&#39;d encourage that. In reading back at his posts (http://www.nasaforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=18957&start=0 - Mike is SaveSpecNeon) , he will be at the Feb TWS R/N race and then the NASA MSRC race March . I won&#39;t be at the R/N but whichever ITA cars are there might want to look around. There was 3 of them at the Dec. school and looks like possibly a total of 5 new Neons next year?

Hey, don&#39;t get me wrong, having new cars joing the fun is GREAT! I like the idea of a friendly "heads up" chat.

okay, i&#39;m confused!

in one post, you are talking about ITA winning cars having this mod.

and then in the next post, you are talking about neons having the mod....

so which is it, an ITA winning car or a Neon?

after getting hit by neons in NASA races, i started referring to them as Spec Neonderthals.

and the smelly telemetry comments reminded me of the timeless classic Lucas Smoke Recharge Kit:

http://www3.telus.net/bc_triumph_registry/smoke.htm

You guys are WAY to nice to give him the heads up. He has mods he KNOWS are illegal (and brags about it). That&#39;s just a slap in the face to the rest of us. I say fry him at his first SCCA event.

Neons,,,or ANY car, can win ITA, IF you race in the right part of the country, and the tough guy(s) don&#39;t show up.....

Heck even my RX-7 has a 1st place ITA trophy under it&#39;s belt!

Well...... is the control arm setup legal or not?

Quote:

---

Well...... is the control arm setup legal or not?
[/b]

---

Ummmm.....No.

And here&#39;s some more insight from one of the links above:

Overall the car is in good shape...more surprises and interesting ideas will be coming to this thread as we go along. There will be some interesting changes along the way. We are going to see how competitive we can make a single cam in ITA.

Just to name a few items on the list:
[b]adjustable lateral links on the rear[/b/
adjustable rear sway bar end links using heim joints
iceman intake
aftermarket computer (I&#39;m using a stock dual cam right now)
tricks with brakes
and a few surprises along the way.

Remember guys, the eye sees what the mind percieves!

A few surprises indeed. :bash_1_:

Quote:

---

Well...... is the control arm setup legal or not? [/b]

---

No way in Hell. And for the record, I&#39;m with Jeff... fry him.

Quote:

---

and a few surprises along the way.

Remember guys, the eye sees what the mind percieves![/b] [/i]

A few surprises indeed. :bash_1_:
[/b]

---

Mee thinks he needs one more surprise..NO warning.

Stone him. :D

Maybe get some Monty Python&#39;s Holy Grail type costumes from a rental shop. :023:

Quote:

---

concur..clearly illegal.

it they were legal every e36 bmw out there would have an adjustable lower rear control arm put in to replace the cheesy failure prone stock part....
[/b]

---

Haven&#39;t seen the car in a while, but there was at least one E36 running those in the SE...

Word must have traveled, his posts have been edited now and content removed. He sounds more like an angel. His signature also changed to include this line...

" Just because you read it on the internet doesn&#39;t mean it is true "

Quote:

---

Word must have traveled, his posts have been edited now and content removed. He sounds more like an angel. His signature also changed to include this line...

" Just because you read it on the internet doesn&#39;t mean it is true, even if you quote me from my own posts. "
[/b]

---

Fixed that for him. :bash_1_:

Chris, thats in the top three of your best posts ever. you should go over to the other site and cross link this thread.

I think Jack M. had a visit with one of the Texas Neon guys and word must have traveled. i would expect things to be right if they run SCCA at TWS in Feb. Not sure of NASA as they are running their own SN class (sort of unoffical) but will be scored in some PT class. That points system still has my head spinning, but I have had fun when a ran NASA events in the past.

Quote:

---

Well...... is the control arm setup legal or not?
[/b]

---

If this were legal... I (or anyone that wishes, not that I am implying or seeming to imply that I want to... but it would make for an interesting project) could build a Fiero that would win ITA hands down!

Heck, I just wished that Honda had rear control arms... or fronts for that matter. Bust the guy at impound after the race... $50 well spent!

hoop