Quote:
Joe,
You know exactly how the process works an what I am saying has NOTHING to do with power. The issue at hand is that the 240SX can make weight in ITS and the 944 potentially does not. If it can, it should sty in S, if it can't, it needs consideration for A.
Now, the process for the 944 does take into account KNOWN crank numbers (which is what the process uses). It equals about a 20% increase over stock power. Some cars like the RX-7 and the E36 in your question use 30% because we know those motors make more. The 240SX we use the standard 25%. We use info we know (when we know it) so overdogs don't appear. If Rotories used the standard 25%, all hell would break loose, etc.
I love you to death Joe, but we are not talking about the same thing here. I don't care one bit about the 240SX in ITS - becasue it can make weight. It's an issue of being able to fit into a class. And that is with this debate is about re: the 944.
[/b]
Andy, You keep saying it can make weight but you have offered no proof that the 240 can legally make weight and I have seen no proof that the 944 can't. You also made my point that the process uses an average percentage gain to classify and you are now using a single data point dyno number on the 944. The process is not being used equally then.