Originally Posted by
JeffYoung
It's a different question this time Kirk.
Why is torque more important of an issue to address than others? Meaning, why do we say yes to one and no to the others.
Jeff has given me a plausible explanation, but I still don't have any real numbers to back it up. But I am still concerned by the groupthink that we need to address torque because it is a advantage and not other just as easily provable advantages.
I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that the best result, for me, for logical consistency is to vote (and it's just one vote) to simplify the process to power and weight, with a FWD modifier.