Quote:
I can honestly see both sides of this, so now I have a different question. How SHOULD the rule be written based on what the competitors want, with input of course from the AC and CRB. I say based on the competitors because ultimately this is a club, and therefore in my opinion the goal shouldn't be nit-picking rules with the intent of protesting others, the preparation rules should be based on creating a level playing field, and contain allowances that participants feel are needed. [/b]
I agree with you completely. I too see both sides of this. At first I thought Darin was nuts. Then, as I pondered and read more carefully, I think he's right. But I also think Kirk an Greg are right. But then I think Darin is right about trying to match non-existing specs. Clearly a quandry. In the end, whatever happens there is likely to be a group of people who will be quite unhappy.
Quote:
Originally posted by mowog@Nov 18 2005, 10:26 AM
So with that in mind, is it fair for some to be able to bore to .040, and others less, if at all?
I wonder how the rotary guys feel about this? I wonder how those with carbs feel about ECU allowances for some (actually I don't, it's been covered quite well - this was rhetorical)? In the end there will always be those can take advantage of a rule while others cannot. Unless we want to race spec, this will always be the case.