Quote:
Just to let you guys know, I have posted on our own forum (ITAC) about this. I think that there is support for an extention from 4 members, but as we don't have a con call with the CRB for weeks, I am not sure what we can do. If I can get a clear majority to support, perhaps we can send the CRB an ITAC request.
But, I'm new on the ITAC, so I'm not sure if thats an approved procedure, and even if it were to be, whether the CRB will agree.
Would a month be a helpful period?
Just thought you should know that your thoughts, letters and the situation isn't being ignored.
(And that I appreciate the letters that are reasonable and well thought out, as opposed to those that call us morons, LOL. )
(As a side note, I don't know who reads the letters along the way, but the CRB does occasionally stop in on the ITAC board and very occcasionaly posts a comment.)
[/b]
Jake, I've had the pleasure of emailing thoughts on these matters to, let me say, who I think, someone of importance up in the SCCA. It is refreshing that someone like him takes the time to actually listen. Even though we don't 100% agree on everything, I think he is open minded and sincere, I'm sure he hopes things work out for what only could and should be better racing. I don't know for sure if my engine is built well enough to be competive. With my SIR otw I guess it's time to find out after testing, etc. etc.. I think 1 more month would be enough if the SCCA would grant us that. But if they don't, all we can do is get ready, test with what we have and know, then go for it. Either way, I've come this far, I'm stubborn and I want to see if this thing will work.