Quote:
First off Sir, I would not choose a 944 again for that very reason, if I can't be competitive I would rather stay home ( that is just me, nothing personal ) and I beg to differ that even with the great Joe Harlan doing the prep, NO 944 8v will find it self at the pointy end of any ITS field short of: a lame 2 or 3 car field like out in the northwest, a giant crash in which the front runner ITS cars are sidelined, a significant cheated up 944, or a field that finds no well prepped RX7, Z, 240's, GSR, VWvr6 etc etc
Sorry to "piss" you off but the ITAC made its mind up against the 944, not just Joe Harlan..... Spend your Nissan money wisely[/b]
No further input from me is needed, you took the first shot which was a dickhead move. The fact that I advocated against your request should not be a reason to make those kinds of accusations. Read the full 18 pages closely. You will see that some of the FACTS I brought out actually made others that normally don't agree with me have a change of mind. I am done posting in this thread. Do as you want with a letter on the Nissan and I will present FACTS to support the current classification. You have only offered emotion based on your lack of prep skills and thing you have not been able to get done in the past. Sorry Fred but that is what drives most requests for relief, I am not shy about saying sometime you gotta pay somebody to get it right otherwise you have to just accept your own skill set and enjoy what you end up with.