Originally Posted by
lateapex911
Yes, that aspect IS troubling. It appears, from this threads references, that the ETKA has multiple versions, and within those versions multiple power specifications. AND am I right in saying that in one case, they list two power origins, (Kw), yet those result in the SAME power number?
Math is math, and that aspect suggests a math error, or a mid ETKA version conversion factor change...that results in two base numbers becoming the same HP number. Rather unlikely.
Ergo, the ETKAs appear inconsistent...and inconsistent regarding a long ago engine...and that strikes me as 'flawed testimony'.
I just don't have confidence in that.