Quote:
what I really do not understand is that the CRB is not saying that you have to wear a device but want to ban any that do not meet this industry standard. now I would understand if the insurance lobby said you must have all you drivers wear a approved device or your rates will go way up/ or we will drop you, but apparently we have not reached that point in time. the proposal is we recomend you wear one but we think that a device that does not meet the "industry standard" is more of a liability than not wearing one at all.
I just don't get it. [/b]
You're certainly in the majority on this one. The only reason I can see (and this has been put forth numerous time already - see above) to have done it this way was to lay the foundation for mandating an SFI-certified device at some point in the future.