Quote:
Hmm.
1. "Please 'run my car through the system,' because you didn't do it during the great realignment of 2006."[/b]
Here is what you might see:
- "Car was run through the process and fits current parameters"
- "Car was passed over in the reset due to lack of interest and information - please write formal proposal to CRB"
Quote:
2. "Please revisit the results of the weight-setting process for my car, because you didn't use the right figures, and therefore got the wrong result."[/b]
- "Car was run through the process and fits current parameters"
- "The information you have provided does indeed confict with the current information on hand. Tabled for more research"
Quote:
3. "Please check that the weight for my car is correct, because even though it got adjusted, it's ended up at a disadvantage because the formula is skewed against my car."[/b]
- "Car was run through the process and fits current parameters"
Quote:
4. "Please consider changing the race weight of my car despite what the formula says it should weigh, because it can't be competitive at that weight."[/b]
- "Car was run through the process and fits current parameters"
Quote:
5. "Please decrease the race weight of my car becaue nobody I know is beating the (insert car-to-beat here)."[/b]
- "Car was run through the process and fits current parameters"
Quote:
6. "Please decrease the race weight of my car because I just can't seem to be competitive..."[/b]
- "Car was run through the process and fits current parameters"
Quote:
We can already see examples of all of these arguments here, and the realignment has just been approved. The distinction between a "1" and a "4" is quickly lost in arguments, particularly when the motivating factor for any presentation might simply be a desire to get a competitive break.
If "1" is OK, what is the response when someone tosses the ITAC a "2?" Observers may not make any distinction so, if the answer's different, there's squawking. If the answer's the same, then how about a "3?"
Where does the line get drawn (he asks, showing his bias that there SHOULD in fact be one)?
K [/b]
I fully expect all the 3-6's to be put to bed. Those are comp adjustments and not what the reset was all about. 1 and 2 are either demand driven where more info will be needed or an error that should be corrected. In either case, it is VERY possible that you get a - "Car was run through the process and fits current parameters".
AB