Originally Posted by
lateapex911
Steve, that's too bad.
Here's why. For anyone who might want to try and rectify the situation, his request served as a problem.
The ITAC is in a constant process of trying to be better. Trying to be responsive, consistent transparent and accountable.
That's much different than the way committees in the club have operated in the past.
because he wrote us requesting an action, we are bound by procedure to respond to the action he requests. IF he had written another type of request, we would be bound to respond to THAT request. The CRB is going to get accountability from the ITAC, and we want the same from the CRB and the BoD.
We might "know" (wink wink) what the requester wants, but, we have to act on what he writes. It's our duty to the club.
(I'll be honest here that there is considerable "discussion" regarding that car, and other procedural factors that affect how that car, and cars like it are handled. We need to make sure that we are consistent. fair, transparent, and accountable in how we handle that case, and similar ones. It IS being worked on.)