Quote:
I just got my ISAAC 1 day after the SCCA's SFI thing.....really disappointing. I'm not sure what to do, it is a pricy investment. The bottom line in my mind. Run an ISAAC if you want to live, run a HANS if you want a H&N that will always pass the political process and provide "some" level of protection. I'm debating getting a HANS as well just because something is better than nothing and until we as a society reel in the trial lawyers it is what it is..............
Use the ISAAC when they're not watching (ie test days, EMRA or whenever) use the HANS when they're (ie false grid, SCCA etc.) putting the pressure on.....expensive but cheaper than most insurance plans deductible for a lengthy hospital stay.
my .02
R
[/b]
Rob, keep in mind the SCCA's rule is only proposed at this time; our ISAACs are still good to go for now. As far as I'm concerned, even if the rule goes through as currently proposed I won't stop using my ISAAC, since at that time mine will no longer be a head and neck restraint, it will then become a "helmet strut" ;)