Inquiring mind seeks knowledge

[Grumpa]

Are we still tied to the VIN rule?

[Gary L]

There are no longer any references to VIN anywhere in the ITCS. The entire paragraph that dealt with VIN (in 9.1.3.C) has been removed.

[Jeremy Billiel]

Are we still tied to the VIN rule?

NOPE.

I know we are underway with recreating our GSR from an RS chassis.

[Grumpa]

Thanks for the reply. I looked in the new GCR and didn't see the VIN paragraph, either, but then my eyes aren't what they used to be.

[ekim952522000]

NOPE.

I know we are underway with recreating our GSR from an RS chassis.

<---Making a VTEC prelude out of a Si here.

[ddewhurst]

Gee, did the price of IT poker just go up with the change of one (1) rule?

Yep, that's just how Production cars got where they are today.:o

At lease with SM they have some balls & are tightening the rules. Good job SMAC.:023:

[dickita15]

Actually it may be a cost savings not have to find a rare tub when building a new car.

[Knestis]

Gee, did the price of IT poker just go up with the change of one (1) rule?

Yep, that's just how Production cars got where they are today.:o

At lease with SM they have some balls & are tightening the rules. Good job SMAC.:023:

No. Ask these guys WHY they're doing what they're doing. Not one of them will say, "Because it's more expensive."

K

[BruceG]

<---Making a VTEC prelude out of a Si here.

Making a Formula VEE from a Z06 Corvette here!! Yee hah:smilie_pokal:

[ddewhurst]

Gee Golly, all it took was one questioning comment about the vin rule change on this site & one of the people who :cavallo:the white horse is has now started a thread to track effect of the vin rule change.


No disrespect to K.

[Knestis]

... No disrespect to K.

No respect expected there, DD. :p

K

[lateapex911]

No respect expected there, DD. :p

K

That made me laugh. Twice.