Rod end/spherical bushing question

pballance

New member
This is one I am sure the GCR scholars will pounce on but here goes. :)

My reading (paraphrase) of the GCR says that bushings can be replaced and solid bushings and spherical bushings may be used provided they provide NO other function other than that of the bushing. If that is the case, here is my question:

Can I replace the rear lower control arm bushings, inner and outer, with spherical bushings?

Of course, it would follow that I could do the same in the front as well but it is still assembled right now. :)

And the real question: Is it going to make that much of a difference over poly bushings? My gut says no and poly, even with replacement issues, wear etc, there will not be a significant (yeah that's loaded) performance change in the car.

I have enough control arms on hand that I could do both but the labor would be a killer.

Thoughts?
 
Yes, you can do that. Took a lot of debate to get to that point, but sphericals are all legal now.

Will it make a noticeable difference? I have them in my car, at great (custom) expense. I can't say for sure how much of the improvement I've seen overall the last 2 years is attributable to them, but they are part of I would suspect most front running IT programs.

Do you need them now? No. Will you need them at some point to have that 100% Z that can run at the front? Yes.
 
Jeff said it all, but I can't reiterate strongly enough how important it is to keep up with your suspension adjustments. I can testify to the detrimental effects of neglecting them. At the last race in Kershaw my spherical bushing on the left rear spun on me causing the tire to be toed in about a half an inch. I was chasing KVS but just couldn't get to the gas. The Silver Bullit was pushing like a dog sled! The setup on the car is worth just as much in lap time as sticker tires, horsepower, shocks, and testicular fortitude. If you have all of them aligning at once you will see everyone else in your rear view mirror.
 
Hmm, pushing like a dog. That is the kind of input I need. Make the suspension work and the lack of hp is less noticible.

I assume you were using solid eccentrics on the rear? I already have those on hand left over from years ago. Anybody got the adjusting tool for Far Performance eccentric bushings I can borrow to make a new tool?
 
Yup, Steve is 100% right. Once you get to a reasonable level of power, it's all about setup and who can stand on the gas the earliest. KVS wasn't beating us with hp at CMP, trust me.
 
Make sure you get those bolts on the front good and tight and check them often. Ask Ron E. what happens :owhen they aren't tight enough.
 
Make sure you get those bolts on the front good and tight and check them often. Ask Ron E. what happens :owhen they aren't tight enough.

Jeff... That's true for just about every bolt on the car! Especially the nut behind the wheel...

Paul... If by "tool" you mean the flat piece of metal that they sell for $6.95 don't waste your money. Vise grips or a large monkey wrench will do the job!

edit... meant to say channel locks, not vise grips.
 
"jeffed" up is beeter then lock tite.....

HI Guys,
Wanted to throw in my 2 cents worth here.....I'm right at the top of the "TFOMC" list. Having suffered through many incomplete weekends due to "TFOMC" I have learned that the only way to make sure that this or that nut/bolt/wheel/steering wheel stays on car is to Jeff it up...... Intentionally cross threading important parts that ARE IMPORTANT TO THE CAR STAYING ON THE TRACK.......has increased chances of finishing races.... Replacing these parts are gonna be a bitcch. I gotta talk to the inventer of this process at roebling to determine proper un doing of a jeffed up project!!


David
 
[
bring that Z car on over to our paddock..I'll Jeff it up for you and make SURE it finishes both races.....lol......

Ron has also bestowed on me, after years of watching me work, the title of Master of the Cross Thread. I can do it anytime, anywhere. Shit's tight though! Just don't be telling me it has to come off or something like that.

quote=dspillrat;263696]HI Guys,
Wanted to throw in my 2 cents worth here.....I'm right at the top of the "TFOMC" list. Having suffered through many incomplete weekends due to "TFOMC" I have learned that the only way to make sure that this or that nut/bolt/wheel/steering wheel stays on car is to Jeff it up...... Intentionally cross threading important parts that ARE IMPORTANT TO THE CAR STAYING ON THE TRACK.......has increased chances of finishing races.... Replacing these parts are gonna be a bitcch. I gotta talk to the inventer of this process at roebling to determine proper un doing of a jeffed up project!!


David[/quote]
 
........I'm right at the top of the "TFOMC" list. Having suffered through many incomplete weekends due to "TFOMC" I have learned that the only way to make sure that this or that nut/bolt/wheel/steering wheel stays on car is to Jeff it up...... David

Ok, I give up, I understand the Jeffed up part but what the heck is "TFMOC"?

David, whatever you do don't go near the Jeffed up paddock. Those guys are likely to try and overtighten the nut behind the wheel and then you would end up driving some british racing green Jeffed up car...................
:p
 
Better than Craftsman. When you empty it, you take it over to MItchell's paddock and grab a brand new one from his cooler!
 
Paul:
I think (meaning this is only my opinion) that there may be another benefit to using the sphericals (or a few depending on who's counting). I think (again IMHO) the main reason the sphericals got declared legal was because at the lower ride heights we are allowed to run some car's suspensions end up in a part of the camber curve they were never really meant to be in (except at extremes of suspension travel). Some cars end up getting a lot of suspension bind at these ride heights. The sphericals, because they can move in more then one plane, help to relieve this issue. On a Zcar, I'm not sure that is an issue. But if you were to take advantage of the allowance to modify your rear crossmember in order to be able to adjust toe on the rear wheel, you may end up with an issue with bind. I've always heard the adjustable (eccentric) bushings for the rear were notorious for moving around and lossing adjustment, so have stayed away. I've never found non adjustable sphericals for the rear and have considered trying to fit something up from scratch. I have the front ones from Design Products. Another possible benefit is that the sphericals move much easier then the poly ones. I've also always heard removing stiction from a strut car is very important for getting that type of suspension to work well.
 
I think you got it Jake. Makes sense to me.

Hmm, I am not sure I can "legally" go with the design products rear control arm. IF it provides adjustment for toe then is it "providing a function that would otherwise be prohibited?"

What do you guys think, although the price is high...
 

Attachments

  • DPR34.jpg
    DPR34.jpg
    80.8 KB · Views: 26
Back
Top